The nal section outlines a different framework from Kohn's which adds to the literature on nationalism by understanding statehood and nationality as a process of change that incorporates tension between civic universalism and ethnic particularism. Western and Eastern nationalism. Hans Kohn revisited. The tradition of. Robson, 'The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in its Origins and Background. Hans Kohn,' The Journal of Politics 7, no. 1 (Feb., 1945): 93-94. Of all published articles, the following were the most read within the past 12 months. Does Immigration Induce Terrorism?

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • INTRODUCTION The Soviet Empire was established at four minutes past two o'clock on the 8th of November 1917 in the Russian capital, Petrograd. In astrological terms, the sun was just then precisely at the centre of the sign of Scorpio. Thus Scorpio can be regarded as the symbol and guardian of Soviet power.

The planet Pluto in turn, affects those under the direct influence of Scorpio. In the past, Mars was said to rule Scorpio but since Pluto's discovery in 1930 and its subsequent integration into the astrological system, it has assumed its rightful place in the sign of Scorpio. The effects of Pluto, even before its discovery, have always been the same, whether or not they were attributed to another planet. The fact that the Soviet empire was born under the 'wrong' planet demonstrates the inscrutable nature of Pluto, which does not show its true face until the time is ripe to restructure power to its own advantage.

It has recently been revealed that the Bolsheviks were well versed in astrology. Scorpio's field of influence includes power and financial developments at the expense of others. This is why the power-mongers of Scorpio need to stick together - to establish a political Mafia, in other words. Pluto in Scorpio also involves certain hidden circumstances, which are revealed only with the passing of time. The astrologer E.

Troinsky claimed as early as 1956 that the Soviet Empire would break up at the beginning of the 1990s. Due to their vindictiveness, cunning, brutality and art of dissembling, the wards of Scorpio are characterised as extremely dangerous opponents.

Those under the power of Scorpio are deeply materialistic extremists who like to exploit others and neither forgive nor forget. If their aims are crossed they become possessed by fury. They stop at nothing to reach these aims. Their true nature remains shrouded in mystery. Scorpio's colour is red and its symbols are the vulture, the snake and the lifeless desert. In the animal kingdom, the scorpion is known as a poisonous creature that prefers the cover of darkness. It has been known to sting others of its kind if they get in its way.

The reader will see that this description suited the Soviet system, its ideology and leaders. The brutality of Soviet power is well documented. Its ideology bore a distinct likeness to the mirage of the desert, since neither of the two have anything at all to do with reality.

Despite personal experience of Communism, the average subject of the Soviet Empire knew nothing of the fundamentals or essential points of Marxism-Leninism, or of its true origins and history. Everything of importance or in the least bit compromising has been concealed in both Western and Soviet history books. The former president of the United States, Ronald Reagan, stated that concealment was a kind of falsehood. Therefore, the author would like to reveal a few facts, which corrupt historians usually pass over in silence. This book deals with Adam Weishaupt, who founded the Illuminist-Socialist movement in the Bavarian town of Ingolstadt on the first of May 1776, and Moses Hess, Karl Marx's guide and teacher, two names, which are not generally known to those who have passed through Marxist educational institutions. There is a saying: communism is the bloodiest, most difficult and the most terrible way from capitalism to capitalism.

The truth of this now appears to be proved by reality. The representatives of the criminal powers who halted Russia's development and threw the country into chaos have now themselves admitted that life was better in tsarist Russia than in the Soviet Union.

As an example of this, a Soviet Russian head clerk in 1968 lived at a standard, which was only 18 per cent of that which a normal Russian clerk enjoyed in 1914. It has also been calculated that a Russian labourer in 1968 lived at a standard, which was only half of his counterpart's in 1914, even counting an inflation rate of 8 per cent per year. Even so, life in Russia was not so hard in 1968 as in 1991, the last year of Soviet power. Workers during the tsarist regime earned 30 roubles per month, teachers and doctors 200.

A loaf of bread (410 g) cost 3 kopecks, 410 g of meat 15 kopecks, 410 g of butter 45 kopecks, 410 g of caviar 3 roubles and 45 kopecks. If we compare the conditions in the USSR with those in the West, we find even sharper contrasts. In 1968, the average standard of living in the United Kingdom was 4.6 times higher than in the Soviet Union. The figures are taken from Anatoli Fedoseyev's book 'About the New Russia' (London, 1980). The last dictator of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev (a member of the Trilateral Commission), sought only to mend the roof of his giant empire when its socialist foundations were rotten to the core. In the West and even in the East, the symptoms of the Socialist disease have been discussed but not its ideological, political, or economic causes.

For this reason, I would like to take this opportunity to inform the reader about the ideological foundations of Soviet power and about the real reasons behind the decision to spread Socialism-Communism throughout the world using cunning and violence, a decision, which has resulted in the greatest spiritual, social and ecological catastrophe in the history of mankind. Important facts, hitherto unknown, about Soviet Communism, its crimes and its criminals, are continually publicised in present-day Russia. Therefore, intelligent Russians are aware of essentials that are very little known in the West. I have included many such new facts in this second edition of 'Under the Sign of the Scorpion', and can present an enlarged work to the reader. Juri Lina Stockholm, January 2002. MYTHS CONCERNING FALSE COMMUNISTS AND SHAM CHRISTIANS In the autumn of 1989, the crimes of the Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu against the Romanian people and the Hungarian minority were discussed on Swedish television.

In the studio was Jorn Svensson, a functionary for the Left-Party Communists (VPK), who claimed that the eastern European communists were not true followers of the workers' ideology because they had deviated from the Marxist doctrine. Since then, the crimes of the eastern European communists have come increasingly to the public's attention. Therefore, their sympathisers in the West sought to take a symbolic distance from them, so as not to jeopardise their own chances to missionise in the future.

Naturally, they regarded themselves as true communists, despite having previously given their full support to the Bolsheviks in the East. This has become so serious a matter that they now claim these sympathies to have been a grave mistake. Some of the western communist parties began to camouflage themselves to hide their true principles, like the Swedish Left Party Communists, who renamed themselves simply the Left Party.

The French communists demanded that their leader, Georges Marchais, step down because he had taken a holiday by the Black Sea as a guest of Ceausescu. Marchais tried to save himself with a cheap trick: he claimed that he had distanced himself from the communist regime in Romania a year earlier, when he said on television that the government of Bucharest had nothing in common with socialism. On the 28th of December 1989, he expressed his hope in the newspaper l'Humanite that true socialism might now begin to be built up in Romania.

Presumably, the three hundred million victims of communism are not enough for certain naive people to perceive the evil of the Marxist doctrine. There is not one honest person who would accept a similar view of the evils of the German national socialists, namely the regret that the leaders happened to be criminals who departed from the 'true and benevolent doctrine', despite the fact that the victims of the Nazi regime were far less than the number of those who perished in the countries, which the communists took over. Milovan Djilas, one of the best-known exposers of communism, stated in an interview for the German magazine Der Spiegel (also published in the Swedish daily newspaper Svenska Dagbladet, 13th April 1983) that he believed the idea of communism had evolved from the culture of the West, from Judaism, from the Utopian philosophy, from Christianity and the medieval sects. We do indeed find some similarities between the communist system and the power structure of the Christian church, especially regarding the ideology and the intolerant attitude. Even a few Christians (not many) have, in retrospect, condemned the Fathers of the Church for their atrocious acts of violence and for laying the foundations of a system of religious totalitarianism in Europe. Certain Christians have called these criminal Fathers of the Church and other barbaric lay members 'sham' Christians. At the same time they make a point of claiming there is nothing intrinsically wrong about the doctrine; that the fault lies with the sheep, which have strayed from the path of the true doctrine.

It is quite improbable that such a doctrine would be without error. The Buddhists have not waged any religious wars or tortured any of their dissidents. Neither have they, like the Christians and the communists, forced their teachings on anyone with violence. The Christians and the communists have both been especially intolerant towards their dissidents. Both Church and Marxism were created with a view to slavery. Both doctrines split into different factions, and both have also claimed a monopoly on the truth. The developments of twentieth century history and science have shown these doctrines to be intrinsically wrong and exploded their dogmas.

Sovietologists have revealed embarrassing facts about Marxism, and many Christian ideas have been overthrown by research in quantum physics. (Paul Davies, 'God and the New Physics', 1983.) Even a cursory glance at the New Testament, which was claimed to be holy, reveals that descriptions are unsupported by any evidence. For instance, the description of Herod the Great is completely erroneous - there is no evidence that he ever ordered any mass slaughter of children. Compared to others, he appears to have been a benevolent king. Historical evidence shows that he, during the great famine in Judea 24 years before the Christian era, bought foodstuffs in Egypt with the government's and his own money, whereupon he organised a fleet to fetch the supplies and distributed them within his kingdom.

'His generosity proved to be spectacular', according to the historian Michael Grant ('Herod the Great', New York, 1967, London, 1971). When the Northern (and poorer) half of Sweden suffered from famine at the end of the nineteenth century, the Bishop of Harnosand refused to distribute supplies among the people lest they got the idea that they were entitled to anything for free; it was better the congregation starved to death. (Dagens Nyheter, 24th December 1989.) Communists are infamous for causing mass famine by confiscating all of the peasants' grain. They nationalised the peasants' land to make them dependent on the state. Both Christians and communists confiscated the lands and possessions of their most dangerous 'enemies'.

The Roman emperor Gaius Julius Caesar (100-44 B. C.) did the opposite by buying land himself and giving it away to his soldiers to make them independent of the state. In the 1920s, Soviet ideologues held up the 'communist state' founded by Johannes Bockelson in Munster in 1534 as an example. A group of fanatical Anabaptists led by Johannes Bockelson seized power in Minister, Westphalia on the 23rd of February 1534, where they proclaimed the Miinster commune, also called 'New Jerusalem'. This commune became the abode of extreme ruthlessness. Three days after the seizure of power, the first leader of the commune, Jan Matthijs, expelled all those who were not ready to accept their beliefs. Later, the leadership passed over to the baptised Jew, Johann Leiden, who proclaimed himself king of New Zion (Miinster), and the town council was replaced by a council of twelve apostles.

They confiscated the property of the church and the wealth of those who had fled. They banned trade, enforced work duty and abolished money.

Everything was to be owned collectively - the people were only allowed to keep their tools - all the produce was confiscated by the commune and polygamy was introduced. This community was intended to become the 'thousand year reign of peace' (the Millennium). Evil reigned in Miinster for sixteen months before the Bishop's troops arrived on the 25th of June 1535 and executed all the leaders of the commune.

Later, the Baptists and the Mennonites arose from the ideology of the Anabaptists. The Anabaptists also took part in the peasant uprising and incited the poor to revolt in several cities in Germany and Holland. The Soviet propagandists were particularly impressed by the political terror, which was the basis of the Anabaptist tactics. Both Joseph Stalin and Felix Dzerzhinsky were to have been ordained as priests, and had examples at hand. In the 1930s, Stalin began to officially compare the communist party with the Teutonic Knights of the Sword (Fratres Militiae Christi) from the 13th century. The Taborite religious fanatic, Thomas Muntzer, attempted to seize power in central Germany during 1524-25 with the help of enraged peasants. He believed Martin Luther's reforms to be insufficient and wanted to abolish property and overthrow the aristocracy.

Descriptions of similar events from an even earlier date can also be found. The Brothers of the Apostles, led by the fanatical Fra Dolcino, seized power in Vercelli, northern Italy, in the early 1300s. Only poverty seemed righteous to them, and so they killed every rich person in the city. The terrorist regime of the Brothers of the Apostles lasted three years, from 1304 to 1307. They did not achieve any form of social equality. The roots of communism can also be found in the book 'The Prince', written by Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) who was the secretary of the Council of Ten in the republic of Florence. The book presents techniques of cynical manipulation and falsehood to support an unlimited dictatorship.

It was published after his death, in 1532. A Soviet joke goes: 'The Christians only preached the advantages of poverty, the communists enforced them.' The similarities between the histories of communism and Christianity are sometimes shocking. Bolshevik leaders did not shy away from killing nine innocent people if the tenth victim would be a true opponent.

Crusaders occupied the French town Beziers in the year 1208, and their leader, Arnold Amalric, a baptised Jew, gave an order typical of that time: 'Kill everyone - God will recognise his own!' When the Cheka's (political police's) chief, Felix Dzerzhinsky reported to Lenin in the summer of 1918 that five hundred intellectuals (scientists and cultural figures) had been executed, Lenin became ecstatic. When Pope Gregory XIII learned that 60,000 Huguenots had been murdered as heretics on the 24th-26th of August 1572, he was similarly elated and held a great feast, conducted a church service, and even minted a new coin to celebrate the massacre. This information comes from Buchwald's book 'The History of the Church'. In 1198, the church established a commission to persecute and try heretics. This later developed into the Holy Inquisition.

In 1483, Tomas Torquemada (1420-1498), a Marrano (baptised Jew), was appointed Grand Inquisitor of Castilia and Aragon. In 1492, he expelled all Jews who refused to become Marranos. Torquemada worked intensively for 18 years and burned people at the stake. He is said to have executed many children personally. Symbolic straw dolls were burned in lieu of those who had been charged in absentia.

Many people were imprisoned for life, and Torquemada sent thousands to the galleys. The terror of the Church in Spain was, however, substantially less than in the rest of Europe. Professors Henry Kamen (Barcelona) and Stephen Haliczer (Illinois) have made important revisions to the information regarding the extent of the administration of justice by the Inquisition. According to professor Jose Alvarez-Junco at the University of Tuft, the Inquisition only executed, at the most, 5000 Spaniards during 350 years, while at least 150,000 people ('witches') were burned at the stake as heretics in the other Christian countries. He concludes that all historians have spread exaggerated information and even myths about the Inquisition.

This Grand Inquisitor made torture an efficient tool: certain parts of the body were burned, certain parts had nails hammered through them, certain chosen victims were flayed alive. In order to secure their possessions, he accused other Marranos of faking their allegiance to Christianity.

Another Marrano, Isaac Abrabael, controlled Spanish finances at the time. In December 1917, a special commission for dealing with counter-revolutionaries was set up in Petrograd.

This organization was called the Cheka in Soviet Russia, and was especially infamous under its subsequent abbreviations - OGPU, NKVD, and lastly as the KGB. The Inquisition encouraged children to betray their 'heretical' parents and married couples to hand each other in. Each informer was paid four silver marks. The Soviet officials encouraged a similar type of betrayal. There are still more similarities between institutions of the Bolsheviks, the Roman Catholic Church, and the freemasons.

High church figures had commissars bearing letters authorising them to exercise the authority of their masters. Similar officials were used in connection with the so-called French revolution and also by the Bolsheviks. The spies used by the church and the Inquisition were called the Militia of Christ; the law-enforcement and reconnaissance organs of the communist dictators were called the People's Militia. The Soviet system had a hierarchy of councils, or Soviets as they were known, of which only the highest, the Supreme Soviet, had the right of pardon - a system reminiscent of the Judaic kahal.

Both the communists and the Christians have practised a dreadful barbarism against opponents. After the crusaders reached the river Carnascio on the 23rd of March 1307, they imprisoned the leader of the Brothers of the Apostle, Fra Dolcino, after first destroying his army of a thousand men.

He was horribly tortured and then executed on June 1st, 1307. For an entire day he was paraded through the streets of Vercelli in a wagon, whilst pieces of his body were ripped off with a pair of red-hot tongs. His shoulders apparently shuddered a little when they tore off his nose, but he had kept silent the rest of the time. Lenin and Stalin showed similar sadism when they liquidated their opponents.

Both the Christians and the communists have knowingly employed criminals. In 1095, Pope Urban II Clermonti released murderers, thieves and other criminals so that they might take part in the crusade in 1096. On their way through Europe, these villains plundered all they could. (Mikhail Sheinman, 'Paavstlus' / 'The Papacy', Tallinn, 1963, p. 32.) The Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky released criminals to terrorise the population. Mao Zedong did the same. The religion of Marxism had roots in Christianity.

As Bertrand Russell pointed out. Yahweh = dialectical Marxism. The Messiah = Marx. The Chosen ones = the proletariat. The church = the communist party. The Second Coming of Christ = the revolution. Hell = punishment of the capitalists.

The millennium or thousand year reign of peace = communism. The Bolsheviks had their own ten commandments and, like the church, they also mocked their opponents. The totalitarianism of the church belongs to the past but if the church should ever regain its former power, its atrocities would probably be repeated. The Jesuit historian Luigi Ciccutini believed in 1950 that the church had the divine right to judge and intervene in any matter whatsoever.

He claims that the church was justified in burning Filippo Giordano Bruno at the stake in February 1600. A similar danger awaits us if the communists (with the help of the financial elite) should ever grow strong again.

After all their atrocities, we should ignore their pretty slogans. One can characterise both Christianity and communism as extremely anti-cultural ideologies, both of which persecuted leading cultural figures. Both have impeded the free development of science. Due to the reactionary attitude of the church, many truths, scientific, religious and esoteric, have still not been accepted. One of the worst crimes of Christianity was the arson ordered by the patriarch Theophilus, which led to the complete destruction of the ancient world's largest library in the Serapis temple of Alexandria in A. The root of this crime was the church's hatred and intolerance of knowledge springing from classical pagan Greco-Roman culture.

Another example is the murder of the female philosopher and mathematician Hypatia in Alexandria in A. The communists also burned books and persecuted cultural figures. They even prohibited the conductor's profession because 'the orchestras could play perfectly well without conductors'. Later, seeing that their orchestras could not manage without their leaders, the communists had to change their tune. Pope Leo X (1513-1521) believed it right and proper to use the 'wonderful fairy tale about Jesus Christ which has given us so many advantages', as he stood upon the festive board and raised his glass.

Laurency, 'Livskunskap Fyra', Skovde, 1995, p. 179.) Moses Hess, one of the most important founders of communist ideology, believed communism to be a perfect lie to spread destruction with. (Moses Hess, 'Correspondence' / 'Briefwechsel', The Hague, 1959.) It is regrettable that ideologies whose fundamental principle is intolerance still halt moral development. Two Swedish bishops, Gottfrid Billing in Vasteras, 1888, and Bo Giertz in Gothenburg, 1950, believed that it would be better to crush a child's head with a rock than not to baptise it (Henry T.

Laurency, 'Livskunskap Fyra', Skovde, 1995, p. Even today, Protestant and Catholic Christians continue to brutally terrorise and murder each other in Northern Ireland. Towards the end of their reign, under Mikhail Gorbachev, the communist leaders in Russia were prepared to ask the Russian Eastern Orthodox Church for help in order to preserve their power. However, what is created by violence cannot long survive. Despite the fact that none were allowed to leave the Soviet communist party without retribution, it still collapsed when thousands of people began to leave this criminal institution in 1990. In August 1991, after the Communist party attempted to overthrow Gorbachev's reforms, the Russian president Boris Yeltsin made the communist party illegal, just as the National Socialist (Nazi) Party was outlawed after the Second World War. Life itself forced them to repudiate their primitive and unreal dialectical materialism as an infallible dogma, to part with the 'holy' book 'Das Kapital', and the 'prophets' - Lenin, Mao, and other mass-murderers.

These worshippers of violence still have their 'holy shrine' - Lenin's Mausoleum - but sooner or later they will come to realise that their Messiah, Marx, is as dead as his ism. But the most troubling and challenging question still remains - will we be able to perceive the new incarnations of this evil? THE ILLUMINATI: TRIUMPH OF TREACHERY On the night of Wednesday, the first of May 1776, three men gathered at the house of a young law professor, Adam Weishaupt, in the Bavarian town of Ingolstadt. They had decided to found a secret order to undermine the social system, at first called the Orden der Perfektibilisten (The Order of Perfectibilists).

Weishaupt had been working on the plans for this order ever since 1770. Among the three guests were two of Weishaupt's students: Prince Anton von Massenhausen, who had helped work out the rules of the Order, and Franz Xaver Zwack, only registered as a member on the 22nd of February 1778.

There was also another man who later went under the pseudonym Tiberius, though nothing more is known about him. The historian Nesta Webster (actually Julian Stern) claimed that the French Count Honore Gabriel Riqueti de Mirabeau, a member of a Dutch Masonic Lodge, was also among the founding members. All the members used pseudonyms in connection with their work. Weishaupt called himself Spartacus, Massenhausen became Ajax and Zwack Cato. The historical Porcius Cato had demanded the total destruction of the city-state of Carthago. Mirabeau was called Arcesilas, but in 1786 his alias became Leonidas (Nesta H. Webster, 'Secret Societies and Subversive Movements', London, 1924, p.

Mirabeau was a famous French orator who had contracted enormous debts. Weishaupt came into contact with Mirabeau through certain Jewish bankers. Mirabeau was blackmailed into joining the Illuminati. (Nikolai Dobrolyubov, 'Secret Societies in the Twentieth Century', St. Petersburg, 1996, p. 23.) Cities and areas that were important to the Illuminati were given ancient names: Ingolstadt was called Ephesus, Munich Athens, Bavaria Achaia, Vienna Rome, Landshut Delphi, Austria Egypt and so on.

With the help of confiscated documents, it can be seen that the Illuminati used the Persian calendar, where October was called Meharmeh, November Abenmeh, December Adarmeh, January Dimeh, etc. The lawyer Franz X. Zwack received his doctor's degree and became adviser to Count Salm in Landshut where a great deal of the Illuminati's archives was brought. Not long afterwards, in 1779, the Order was renamed Orden der Illuminaten. Their primary watchword was: 'The Illuminati must control the world!'

But first Adam Weishaupt wanted a German unification. In 1779, Spartacus (Weishaupt) had written a letter to Marius (Jakob Anton von Hertel) and Cato (Zwack) and suggested a change of name.

They intended to call themselves 'Bienenorden' (Order of Bees) but they kept in 'Orden der Illuminaten' in the end. ('Einigen Originalschriften des Illuminaten-ordens' / 'Collected Original Writings of the Illuminati Order', Munich, 1787, p. 320.) The Illuminati ('The Illuminated Ones') eventually became a powerful und despotic organization in Bavaria. Its members included Baron von Thomas Bassus, Marquis Constantin Costanzo, Baron Mengenhoffen, Friedrich Munter and other influential people. The Order was founded on approximately the same principles as the Jesuit Order. Adam Weishaupt had worked five years to develop a system, which suited him. The Order was divided into three classes (the Jesuits had four).

The first class was for novices and the lesser illuminated (Minerval), the second for freemasons (including the Scottish Knights), and the third, the mystery class, was comprised of priests, regents, magicians and a king (the Jesuits had a general). Their goal was to impose Novus Ordo Seclorum: the New World Order. The Ideological Background of the Illuminati In 1492, the Alumbrado (The Enlightened) movement was founded by Spanish Marranos (baptised Jews who secretly kept their Talmudic faith) and a similar organization was founded in France in 1623 - 'Guerients' who changed their name to Illuminati in 1722.

The Spanish authorities attempted to stop the Alumbrado movement as early as 1527 when Ignatius Loyola was temporarily arrested for his activities with the Illuminati. Loyola (Inigo Lopez de Regalde), who was of Jewish blood, was born in the 1490s. In 1534, he founded his own order - the Jesuits - taking out a loan for the purpose. The Pope acknowledged the Jesuit Order on the 5th of April 1540. Benjamin Disraeli, author and prime minister of Great Britain in 1868, and 1874-76, himself a Jew, wrote in his book 'Coningsby' (London, 1844) that the first Jesuits were Jews.

In this new order, all members were under Loyola's surveillance. It was the Jewish Jesuit Cardinal Roberto Bellarmino (1542-1621) who ordered the philosopher Filippo Giordano Bruno burnt at the stake on the 17th of February 1600.

In 1771, 23-year-old Weishaupt met Kolmer, a Danish Cabbalist Jew who had just returned from Egypt. Kolmer initiated Weishaupt into the secrets of Osiris magic, the Cabbala and the Alumbrado movement. Nesta Webster assumed that he had been known in Italy as Altotas, Cagliostro's master. Kolmer's occult knowledge made a deep impression on Weishaupt, who later chose the Egyptian pyramid as the Illuminati's symbol of power, probably using an illustration from the book 'Pyramidography' (1646) by Jean Greaves, professor of astronomy at Oxford. One year earlier (1770), Weishaupt had been given a post as lecturer in canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. He later received his doctor's degree and in 1773, at the age of 25, became a professor at the same university.

During a short period he even held the post of principal. In 1800, the university moved to Landshut and from there to Munich in 1826. It was no coincidence that the Order of the Illuminati was founded on the first of May. Among the Cabbalist Jews, this date, 15 (1.5), symbolised the sacred number of Yahweh and so became their occult holiday. According to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, the first of May - the day following Walpurgis Night - is when the dark mystical forces are celebrated. At this time a young Jew named Mayer Amschel (born February 23rd, 1744) was being tutored to become a rabbi. Amschel lived with his parents in the Jewish ghetto of Frankfurt am Main.

He later took the name Rothschild. It was Mayer Amschel Rothschild who convinced Weishaupt to wholly accept the Frankist Cabbalist doctrine and who afterwards financed the Illuminati. Rothschild had given Weishaupt the task of reestablishing the old Alumbrado movement for the Cabbalist Jews. Theoretical Cabbala embraces only secret teachings about God and nature. But practical Cabbala (such as Frankism) attempts to affect earthly matters. It involves the use of amulets and magic numbers as well as the conjuring of evil spirits.

Both the Talmud and Midrash contain Cabbalist information. ('Ancient Oriental and Jewish Secret Doctrines', Leipzig, 1805.) Jakob Frank (1726-1791) was the most frightening phenomenon in Jewish history, according to the Jewish professor Gershom G. His actions were totally immoral. Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman shows in his book 'To Eliminate the Opiate' (New York, 1974) that there was a clear connection between Frankism and Weishaupt's Illuminism.

The goal of the Frankists was to work in secret to establish Jewish world supremacy. Professor Scholem has clearly documented that they achieved extensive political power. Jakob Frank (actually Leibowicz) was born in 1726, in Polish Galicia.

He officially converted to Catholicism but this was just camouflage. Jakob Frank was jailed in 1760 for continuing to teach the Cabbala (Zohar) and for practising secret Jewish rituals. In 1773, the Russians attacked the region of Poland where Frank was held prisoner. He was released and moved to Offenbach (near Frankfurt am Main) in Germany where he began to lead a luxurious and wild life. His deeds were evil, his personality nefarious.

This information comes from Professor Gershom G. Scholem's books 'Cabbala' (New York and Scarborough, 1974), Sabbatai Zevi' (New Jersey, 1973) and 'The Messianic Idea in Judaism' (New York, 1971).

Jakob Frank summed up his doctrine in his book 'The Words of the Lord'. He asserted that the creator God was not the same as the one who had revealed himself to the Israelites. He believed God was evil. Frank proclaimed himself as the true Messiah.

He vowed not to tell the truth, rejected every moral law, and declared that the only way to a new society was through the total destruction of the present civilisation. Murder, rape, incest and the drinking of blood were perfectly acceptable actions and necessary rituals. Frank was one of those refractory Jews who worshipped devils.

The extremist Jews were particularly fond of a devil called Sammael. Ekbohrn, '100,000 frammande ord' / '100,000 Foreign Words', Stockholm, 1936, p. 1173.) Joseph Johann Adam Weishaupt was born on the 6th of February 1748 in Ingolstadt, by the Danube, in Bavaria, into an assimilated Jewish family. (Pouget de Saint Andres, 'Les auteurs caches de la revolution francaise', p. 16.) His father was a professor at the University of Ingolstadt. ('The Trail of the Serpent', Hawthorne, 1936, p.

68.) He was educated in a Jesuit monastery and studied law, literature, and atheist philosophy. In 1773, the twenty-five-year-old Weishaupt left the Jesuit Order. This may have been because he had developed his independent ideology, but the subsequent dissolution of the Jesuit Order in 1773 by Pope Clement XIV may also have been a factor. The Jesuit Order in France, Spain, Portugal, Naples and Austria was dissolved. A few years later, Weishaupt's 'Perfektibilist' Order began to work against the Roman Catholic Church. In 1814, however, the Jesuit Order was re-established and through new infiltrations became more powerful than ever before.

In 1775, Professor Weishaupt became a member of the lodge Theodor zum guten Rat within eclectic freemasonry. Later, Weishaupt was to use this foothold in Munich to allow his Illuminati to infiltrate all the other Masonic lodges, due to the fact that he wielded great influence over the lodge through its Grand Master, Professor Franz Benedict (Xaver) von Baader, who had joined the Illuminati. It was Baron Adolf von Knigge (born 16th October 1752 in Bredenbeck, died 6th May 1796 in Bremen), Adam Weishaupt's closest collaborator, who later helped him to gain entrance to different Masonic organizations. (Pat Brooks, 'The Return of the Puritans', North Carolina, 1976, pp. 68-69.) In 1777, he received the highest degree of the Knights Templar (Knight of Cyprus) in Hanau. The 27-year-old Knigge joined the Illuminati in Frankfurt in 1780 under the alias of Philo (the original Philo was a Jewish scholar). The Illuminati began to work especially actively after the entrance of Adolf von Knigge in July 1779.

Baron von Knigge also wrote the book 'Concerning Association with People'. He brought together many powerful men. It was largely thanks to Philo that the organization spread through the whole of Germany. Both financial and sexual favours were used to gain control of people in high places. In time, the Illuminati won control of every Masonic order in the world. Important financiers joined the organization: Speyer, Schuster, Stern and others.

The Jews had therefore gained a very powerful position. Their base of operations was Frankfurt am Main. Adam Weishaupt In Hamburg, a powerful Jewish-Cabbalist family grew forth. Their name was (Samuel Moses) Warburg and they also joined this conspiracy of world supremacy.

The Jesuits had taught Weishaupt much, not least their doubtful morals. He encouraged his closest collaborators to use the lie as a tool and to avoid giving the public any true explanations. The leaders of the Illuminati saw to it that their most dangerous opponents and others who might be a threat to the secrets of the Order were poisoned. Winrod, 'Adam Weishaupt - a Human Devil'.) Weishaupt got his wife's sister pregnant and, not being able to pay 50 marks for an illegal operation, he unsuccessfully tried to bring about an abortion by the use of drugs. A boy was born on the 30th of January 1784.

Later, Weishaupt suddenly became rich. In 1777, the Illuminati began to co-operate with all the Masonic lodges (especially the Grand Orient) in order to infiltrate them. The Duke of Brunswick, Grand Master of Germany, said in 1794 that the Masonic lodges were controlled by the Illuminati. When Weishaupt became a member of the Grand Orient, the lodge was backed financially by Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812), according to the British historian Nesta Webster. Bernard Lazar, a well-known Jewish author, wrote in his 'L'Antisemitisme', in 1894, that exclusively Cabbalist Jews surrounded Weishaupt. Confiscated documents show that of 39 Illuminati holding lesser leading positions, 17 were Jews (i.e., 40%).

The higher one looked in ranks, the larger was the percentage of Jews. Even the fact that the Illuminati headquarters in Ingolstadt were later converted into a synagogue was symbolic of this conspiracy. Lazar stated that all these Jews became the agents of revolution because they had 'revolutionary souls'. There were four especially important Jews in the Illuminati leadership: Hartwig (Naphtali Herz) Wessely, Moses Mendelssohn, the banker Daniel von Itzig (1723-1799) and the businessman David Friedlander.

(La Vieille France, 31st of March, 1921.) All of the initiated had taken a vow 'to eternal silence and undeviating loyalty and total submission to the Order'. Each member had to promise. 'If you are a traitor and a perjurer, then know that the brothers shall take up arms against you. Do not hope to flee or to find a place to hide.

Wherever you are, shame, contempt and the wrath of the brothers shall pursue and torment you to your innermost entrails.' Most members were led to believe that the lower degrees of mystery they had reached were the highest. Few members had been informed about the true purpose of the Order. The Illuminati's codex was presented in Masonic terms and prescribed lies, treachery, violence, torture and murder in order to reach all its goals.

Many members believed themselves to be working for an improvement of the world. They never guessed that Weishaupt's true purpose was to establish Novus Ordo Seclorum, a global program for world domination. The Protestant princes and rulers in Germany were well disposed to Weishaupt's official plan to destroy the Catholic Church and they sought membership in his Order. Through these men Weishaupt gained control over the Masonic Orders, into which he and his other Jewish cronies were initiated in 1777. To prevent the rulers from understanding the true aims of the Illuminati, he forestalled their contact with the higher degrees. During the year following its founding, the Order was spread exclusively through southern Bavaria. Later, it gained a foothold also in Frankfurt am Main, Eichstadt and other cities, according to 'Vagledning for frimurare' / 'Guidance for Freemasons', Stockholm, 1906, p.

Officially, the Illuminati were supposed to spread virtue and wisdom, which was to subdue evil and stupidity. They wanted to make great discoveries in all branches of science. The Illuminati were to be cultivated into noble, eminent people, also according to 'Guidance for Freemasons'. Weishaupt's original Illuminati system Several important men in Ingolstadt and Bavaria lost their posts, some were even imprisoned or expelled from the country - but some of those involved were so powerful that they were spared retribution. The freemasons did not believe they were given a fair trial, as no defence was permitted. In the autumn of 1786, the Elector Karl Theodor demanded that the Illuminati cease their activities. They did not.

In 1786, two remarkable books about the Illuminati were published: 'Drei merkwurdige Aussagen' (in which Professors Griinberg, Cosandey und Renner testified) and 'Grosse Absichten des Ordens der Illuminaten' ('Great Purposes of the Order of the Illuminati') with Professor Joseph Utzschneider's testimony. After a lengthy inquiry, the Elector ordered two works containing confiscated secret documents to be printed under the titles: 'Einige Originalschriften des Illuminaten-Ordens' and 'Nachtrag von weitern Originalschriften' ('Some Original Documents of the Illuminati Order' and 'Supplement of Further Original Documents').

These books were sent to the governments in Paris, London and St. Petersburg, but were not taken seriously (until it was too late). Johann Baptist Strobl also printed a new collection of documents concerning the Illuminati in 1787. According to 'Guidance for Freemasons', Weishaupt, von Knigge, Bode and the other 'most distinguished Illuminati' were noble-minded, honest and well-intentioned men who aspired towards goodness and justice.

Some truly lofty cultural personalities allowed themselves to be fooled by the skillful Illuminati propaganda. Adam Weishaupt, as a skilled propagandist, had previously written the books 'An Apology for the Illuminati' (1786), 'Das Verbesserte System der Illuminaten' / 'The Improved System of the Illuminati' (1788), 'Spartacus und Philo', (1794), and others.

When the Illuminati were banned on 4 August 1785, Zwack fled to Augsburg and from there to Weslar. After the death of the Elector, Zwack returned to Bavaria, where he was reinstated as a civil servant. Von Knigge travelled to Bremen, where he died as a British officer on 6 May 1796. Several other members were dismissed from their posts. All according to the Grand Master of the Illuminati, Leopold Engel. Even the great poet Johann Wolfgang von Goethe became a freemason in 1780 and joined the Illuminati somewhat later in the 1780s. His alias within the Order was Abaris.

('Geschichte des Illuminaten-Ordens' / 'History of the Order of the Illuminati' by Leopold Engel, Berlin, 1906, pp. But eventually he was able to see through their deception. The Illuminatus Goethe wrote to Bode, a fellow member, on the 22nd June 1784: 'Believe me, our moral world is undermined by sub-terranean tunnels, basements and sewers, like a large town usually is, without anyone usually thinking of their connections. It is comprehensible to me or any other enlightened person if smoke sometimes rises from a crack or if strange voices are heard.' The Murders of Schiller and Mozart The great poet and playwright Friedrich von Schiller moved to Mannheim on the 27th July 1783. In June 1784 Christian Gottfried Korner (1756-1831), an important Illuminatus, sent Schiller a letter suggesting he join the Illuminati.

Korner saw to it that all Schiller's debts were paid off and following this, he joined the Order. An Illuminatus was bound by the codex of the Order. 'I shall perform an action, if asked by the Order, which I may not consent to, inasmuch as it (when seen as a whole) would truly be wrong. Furthermore, even if it might seem so from a certain point of view, it would cease to be improper and wrong if it served as a means to thereby achieve blessedness or the final aim of the whole.' This quote comes from the documents of the Order which were taken during the police search of Baron Bassus' castle in Sandersdorf and later published under the collective title 'Nachtrag von weitern Originalschriften' in Munich, 1787. Two defectors from the Order - Professors Cosandey and Renner - also confirmed in April 1785 that an Illuministic principle was 'the ends justify the means'. It was only later that Schiller was able to see through the deception.

Deception and blackmail were the order's ways to reach its aims. Weishaupt had advised his closest Illuminati brothers. 'Devote yourselves to the art of deception, the art of disguising yourselves, of masking yourselves, spying on others and perceiving their innermost thoughts.' To make sure that the secrets of the Order were not leaked, Weishaupt created a secret police corps within the Order which he called the 'insinuating brothers'. These worked in the same manner as the Bolshevik's Cheka and its successors: denunciation, provocation, blackmail and terrorism. The 'insinuating brothers' acted with full force during the reign of terror which is called the 'Great French Revolution', which was largely the work of Illuminati agents.

Following the French Revolution, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe declared his detestation of it to Eckermann. He said that all sudden changes brought about by violence were repugnant to him because they went against the order of nature. ('Goethe' by Karl Vietor, Stockholm, 1953, p.

100) Naturally, Friedrich von Schiller could not suspect that Heinrich Voss, a young doctor who took care of him, was one of the 'insinuating brothers' who reported everything he heard and saw to Weishaupt. Schiller, Pestalozzi and several other Illuminati from Germany were given French citizenship as 'prominent foreigners' in 1792. Schiller read about this in the newspaper Moniteur. After seeing through the Illuminati's evil nature, Schiller planned to write a play called 'Demetrius', the working title of which became 'The Bloodbath in Moscow'. This play was to uncover some of the atrocities behind the scenes of those in power.

Heinrich Voss reported this to Weishaupt who wished to stop this play at any cost. Fortunately for the Illuminati, Schiller died after a long illness at around six o'clock on the 9th of May 1805. Hermann Ahlwardt claims in his book 'Mehr Licht' / 'More Light' (1925, pp. 60-69) that Schiller was murdered by the Illuminati. A collective of German and foreign experts (including Sten Forshufvud from Gothenburg and Professor Hamilton Smith from Glasgow) found arsenic in samples of Schiller's hair.

The 45-year-old Schiller's work was never completed; instead he ended up in a mass grave. (Henning Fikentscher, 'The Latest Developments in Research of Schiller's Mortal Remains'.) On 5 December 1784, the freemasons asked the brilliant Austrian composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart to become a freemason. He joined the lodge Zur Wohltatigkeit (To Charity) on 14 December 1784. He was also a member of another lodge, Zur wahren Eintracht (To True Concord). This was a double lodge. Soon Mozart reached the very highest degree, the 33rd. Mozart wrote many compositions for Masonic ceremonies.

The most important freemasons in Vienna were Illuminati at the same time. In 1783, 36 of the 83 brothers in Zur wahren Eintracht were Illuminati. There were also many conspirators among the members of To Charity. Mozart's powerful friend, Baron Gottfried van Swieten was an Illuminatus. Also his closest friend Count August von Hatzfeld was an Illuminatus.

In his obituary notice for Hatzfeld in 1787, the local leader of the Illuminati, Christian Gottlob Neefe, praised him in Magazin der Musik. Neefe was Beethoven's teacher. It was for this reason that Beethoven became a freemason and gained close ties to many Illuminati, including Gemmingen, who had helped Mozart in Mannheim and recruited him as a member of To Charity. Mozart was impressed by the official intentions of the Illuminati. He did not know any more details.

He had no idea what his influential friends really intended. There is no clear information about whether Mozart even knew that his friends were members of the subversive Illuminati. They only revealed their membership to those whom they might be able to recruit. Adam Weishaupt had taught. 'To some of these freemasons we shall not even reveal that we have anything more than what the freemasons have.

All those who are not suitable for the work shall remain in the Masonic lodge and advance there without knowing anything about the additional system.' ('Einige Originalschriften des Illuminatenordens', Munich, 1787, p. 300.) In December 1785, the Illuminati's activities in Vienna were prohibited.

The Illuminati were forced to leave their lodges. Despite the ban, they continued to act as ordinary freemasons. They went over to The Crowned Hope. The Illuminati Ignaz von Born, Joseph von Sonnefells and Otto von Gemmingen founded a new lodge, The Truth, the Grand Master of which was Born. The Illuminati believe that they preach the ultimate truth. On 14 January 1786, Mozart joined the new lodge The Crowned Hope.

But he was not present at the opening ceremony and later he seldom attended their meetings. During this period, Mozart seldom wrote Masonic music. Mozart belonged to the society where the Illuminati still dominated.

Only during the last year of his life, 1791, did he produce new pieces of music for the freemasons. This music contained secret codes and moods. Mozart desired true friends. This was why he became a freemason. All his friends were freemasons.

As a very sociable person, Mozart could not be alone and therefore needed friends to associate with. It has been observed that Mozart, due to his membership in Masonic lodges, found it easier to succeed and to make a name for himself in Europe, since high-ranking Masonic brothers supported him. Nearly half of the members of To True Harmony were aristocrats who helped Mozart, for example Esterhazy. Mozart's publishers were also freemasons: Pasquale Artaria, Cristophe Torricella and Franz Anton Hoffmeister. Mozart could always count on the brotherly hospitality of the freemasons, and during his sojourns abroad, he always received economic support and free lodgings. During his travels 1787-1791, the freemasons in Prague and other places helped Mozart in various ways. There is written evidence which proves this.

Friends among the freemasons played a crucial role in aiding Mozart financially: Lichnowsky, Franz Hofdemel and Michael Puchberg were among his most important creditors. Mozart, in his turn, helped other freemasons by acquiring loans for them. In December 1787, Mozart was appointed the imperial chamber composer. This gave him requisitions for greater operas. The Illuminati had become a state within the state. Despite all the prohibitions, they continued with their subversive activities against society. At that time, people lacked experience and resources to protect themselves against freemasonry, which was under the influence of the Illuminati.

The prominent Austrian composer Franz Schubert was not a freemason and he died poor and unappreciated. As a gifted man, Mozart finally managed to see through the Illuminati's evil, despite the fact that it appeared to be an angel of light. He intended to protect society by founding a secret society with several of his friends, Die Grotte ('The Cave').

Mozart was well aware of the deadly risk he was taking. Already in April 1787, he wrote in a letter to his father that death was actually the friend of man and that he could never lie down to sleep without thinking that he, despite his youth, might not see another day. (Maynard Solomon, 'Mozart', Stockholm, 1995.) He wished to expose the magic and the conspiracy of the freemasons to the public.

For this purpose he intended to use his opera 'Die Zauberflote' ('The Magic Flute'), where Sarastro's prototype was the Grand Master of the freemasons, Ignaz von Born. Mozart had a perfect memory. Once he had heard a melody, he could play it again later without making any mistakes. 'The Magic Flute' (1791) contained many revelations about the secrets of freemasonry. He used the pyramid of the Illuminati, the all-seeing eye, the temple and other secret symbols. These metaphors were later removed.

Mozart also used musical means of expression by contrasting lyrical and tragic themes, elegance and folklore, fantastic details and the solid atmosphere of the orchestra. The opera premiered in the autumn of 1791. The Illuminati could not forgive Mozart for this.

'Requiem' was requisitioned from him anonymously in order to celebrate his own death. He was also paid in advance. The freemasons poisoned the object of their hatred slowly. 'Requiem' was finished up to the second-to-last row of verse: lacrymosa dies ilia.

Sussmayr finished the opus. Hermann Ahlwardt claimed in his book 'Mehr Licht!' ('More Light') that Mozart was murdered.

He died on 5 December 1791, precisely seven years after his initiation into the Masonic lodge. Salieri was later made the scapegoat. Hermann Wagener's 'Staats - und Gesellschaftslexikon' (volume 18, 1865) confirmed that Mozart was poisoned. In 1990, several doctors tried to claim that Mozart died of a kidney disease. (Dagens Nyheter, 19 September 1990.) But if he had died a natural death, the freemasons would not have taken away Mozart's body to prevent an autopsy after he died, or laid him in a grave for the poor together with quicklime.

If Mozart had been faithful to the freemasons, he would have been buried with great honours. His hypocritical 'Masonic friends' wept crocodile tears.

If 'The Magic Flute' had been accepted, those in power would not have sent Johann Emanuel Schikaneder, author of the opera's libretto, to a lunatic asylum, where he died in 1812. In Austria, freemasonry was forbidden in the middle of the 1790s. Society managed to keep its ban on this subversive movement until 1918, when the freemasons in Austria came to power with the aid of the false socialist doctrine. The freemasons continue to smear and depreciate Mozart today (for example Milos Forman in his film 'Amadeus'). The Illuminati as Infiltrators The Illuminati moved freely within the many secret societies of the time seeking to utilise the liberal ideology of freemasonry as a bait for those who lacked knowledge of its true purposes. 'All Illuminati are freemasons but far from all freemasons are Illuminati,' stated Professors Cosandey and Renner from Munich in their testimonies in April 1785.

Only a minority was allowed to reach the highest mystery degrees. Only those few knew of the true intentions of the order. Cosandey and Renner, together with several other witnesses, claimed that 'there was constant talk of the purpose' without any explanation of what this was. Those of the lower degrees ('useful idiots') were only to obey, without understanding why. Weishaupt's plan for seizing power was ingeniously simple. The moulders of public opinion (priests, writers, public officials) were to be made obedient tools, whereupon they would, in Weishaupt's words 'surround the princes'.

As 'advisers' they were to influence political decisions in favour of the Illuminati's aims. When entering the Order, the new brothers had vowed: 'I shall never use my position or post against another brother.' This corrupt group loyalty did not relate to the brothers as individuals, however; they were only tools for the invisible powers within the Order. It could just as easily be turned against any particular brother if the 'purpose' (i.e., Weishaupt himself) decreed it. So the brothers of the lower degrees were made to provide information (on printed forms) each month on their own actions and those of fellow brothers (the so-called Quibus licet).

The leaders of the Order compiled information from these 'confessions' which they could use later against any refractory brothers. Weishaupt also encouraged the Illuminati to steal or copy secret and government documents. The Order needed these documents for its revolutionary activities but it also wanted the brothers to lose any feelings of loyalty for the established order by having them constantly seeking to betray it. Religion, nationalism, patriotism, loyalty to the ruler, family ties - all such feelings were to be replaced by a single strong loyalty to the Illuminati's cause. A defector, Joseph Utzschneider, a professor at the Military Academy in Munich, revealed that the constant preaching against the fatherland disgusted him so much that he left the Order. The supranational socialist power the Illuminati aspired to was summed up in the concept of Novus Ordo Seclorum (The New World Order).

Some of the main points of this program were. Suppression of all religion, including all communions and doctrines which could not be subjected as tools for Illuminism. Suppression of all feelings of nationality and - in the long term - abolition of all nations and introduction of an Illuministic world-state. Successive transference of all private and national property into the hands of the Illuminati. The methods whereby to accomplish this were new taxation laws which Illuministic officials were to introduce.

Weishaupt's original plans also included a progressive income tax (so this is no new invention!) and an even more confiscatory inheritance tax. Karl Marx, too, wanted a high, progressive income tax in his 'Communist Manifesto'. The intention was to weaken society.

An all-encompassing espionage and denunciation system with the 'insinuating brothers' as prototype. The symbol of this was the all-seeing eye, an eye within a pyramid, which was the Illuminati's symbol of power. And finally: 5. A global moral rule, a complete standardisation of all people's innermost will, wishes and aspirations beneath 'the one will'; the will of the Illuminati. The Illuminati simply wanted to abolish all forms of ordered government, patriotism, religion and the family to finally set up a world government.

Upright people would never work for such an abhorrent program, so the 'normal' Illuminati were filled with fair phrases about love, charity and suchlike which we call 'ideology' today. The further up one advanced, the more primitive were the members. The more primitive the individuals, the lower the ideals enthusing them. Therefore, the Illuminati have used all sorts of ideologies (Nihilism, Liberalism, Fascism) or made them up themselves (Marxism, Communism, Socialism) whereas they themselves were perfectly independent of all ideology. In 1933 The Greater Soviet Encyclopedia published a large amount of information about Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati, but after this year the entries were blatantly inconsequential.

A conference was held at Mayer Amschel Rothschild's castle in Wilhelmsbad on the 16th July 1782, where the freemasons and Illuminati forged a complete alliance. In this way, the leading secret societies began a closer co-operation with the Illuminati. Thereby, Weishaupt gained no less than three million tools to work with. In time, the Illuminati were to bring death and suffering to hundreds of millions of people. At the Masonic conference in Wilhelmsbad, a decision to murder Louis XVI of France and Gustavus III of Sweden was made.

(Charles de Hericault, 'La Revolution', p. 104.) The initiative for this conference was Jewish. Cowan, 'The X Rays in Freemasonry', London, 1901, p. 122.) A decision to murder emperor Leopold of Austria was also made at the conference. He was poisoned on the 1st March 1792 by the Jewish freemason Martinowitz. Gustavus III of Sweden was murdered the same month.

The freemasons had gathered in Lyon in 1778 to discuss the coming revolution. Further congresses were held in Paris in 1785 and 1787 and in Frankfurt am Main (where Rothschild had his bank) in 1786. The Illuminati sought control over the press and began placing their infiltrators behind the scenes as 'experts'. The Order also wanted to influence schools. In 1800, the Illuminati were active in Sweden, Austria, Russia and many other countries.

Three years earlier, Professor John Robison had written a thorough exposure of the Illuministic plot in his book 'Proofs of a Conspiracy' (London, 1797). The English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley was initially also fooled by the Illuminati's propaganda, despite Weishaupt having stated fairly distinctly that the purpose of the Illuminati was to act tirelessly until 'leaders and nations disappear without violence from the Earth, humanity becomes one great family and the world a residence for sensible people'. But later Shelley came across a copy of Abbe Barruels' sensational book 'Memoirs, Illustrating of History of Jacobinism', which had been published in 1798. This book revealed, with the help of certain Bavarian documents, the Illuministic Jews' conspiracy. Shelley took these revelations seriously and recommended the book to his friends.

He began to regard the Illuminati as evil incarnate and even suggested to Leigh Hunt, the outspoken author that they found a society where the sensible members would stand against 'the society of freedom's enemies'. Shelley afterwards continued to see through the machinations of the Illuminati behind the political scenes. The Americans Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton became acquainted with Weishaupt's doctrine in the 1790s.

Jefferson and Hamilton opened the Masonic lodges in the United States of America to European Illuminati, despite many voices being raised in warning against this action. Among these protestants was John Quincy Adams, who was later elected president (1825). He wrote a letter to Colonel William L.

Stone revealing how Jefferson exploited the Masonic Order to undermine society. The Illuminati retaliated by making Adams' attempted re-election impossible. Adams was subjected to a vicious smear campaign by the national press, which had already come under the control of the Illuminati. Adams also tried to publish a revealing book about the Illuminati but the manuscript was stolen. Captain William Morgan, who had reached a high degree within freemasonry and had a central position in the order, found some of the terrible secrets of the Illuminati in his Batavia Lodge No. 433 in Batavia, New York.

He became aware of the Illuminati's goals and travelled around the USA to warn the Masonic lodges. In 1826, he explained that it was his duty to warn the public about the secret plans of the Illuminati. Morgan wanted to expose the shady activities of the Masonic elite in a book.

He signed a contract with the publisher, Colonel David C. The book, 'Freemasonry Exposed', was published in 1826. This brought the members of the concerned lodges to the verge of nervous collapse. At that time there were 50,000 freemasons in the USA. After the publication of this book, 45,000 freemasons left their lodges. Nearly 2000 lodges were closed.

Many of the remaining lodges cancelled their activities. In the state of New York alone, there were 30,000 freemasons. After Morgan's book was published, the number of members decreased to 300. Whalen, 'Christianity and American Freemasonry', 1987, p.

9.) Richard Howard, an English Illuminatus, was sent to America to murder Morgan. Together with four others he kidnapped Morgan and drowned him in a lake, the intention being to scare other freemasons into submission.

(Michael di Gargano, 'Irish and English Freemasons and their Foreign Brothers', London, 1878, s. 73.) The American historian Emanuel M. Josephson revealed in his book 'Roosevelt's Communist Manifesto' (New York, 1955, p. 24) that the Illuminati's Columbia Lodge was founded in New York in 1785. Its first leader was Governor DeWitt Clinton, followed by Clinton Roosevelt. In 1786 the Illuminati lodge in Virginia was founded and Thomas Jefferson became its leader.

When Weishaupt was exposed in Bavaria, Jefferson defended him as an 'enthusiastic philanthropist'. Within a short time the Illuminati had opened fifteen lodges in America. Thomas Jefferson did all he could to finally get the Illuminati's pyramid accepted by Congress as the national (great) seal on the 15th September 1789. In 1789, the publicist, statesman and scientist Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), himself a freemason, demanded that the United States of America defend itself against the Jewish immigration and influence with the help of the constitution, since the Jews had become a state within the state.

This demand was refused and instead the Star of David became the symbol of the military and police in America. George Washington, who had become a freemason in 1752 when he was 20 years old, also attempted to oppose the Illuminati's work in America after he was convinced in 1796 that they posed a threat to the nation.

Due to this, Weishaupt had made plans to murder Washington if he became too troublesome. (Neal Wilgus, 'The Illuminoids', New York, 1978, p.

33.) David Pappen, President of Harvard University, also came out with a warning against the Illuminati on the 19th of July 1798, and somewhat later Timothy Dwight, President of Yale University, followed suit. This led Henry Dana Ward, Thurlow Weed and William H. Seward to form an anti-Masonic party in the United States of America in 1829. The Party took part in the presidential elections in 1832 but 1840 had already outmanoeuvred it. Weishaupt, like Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) in the Republic of Florence, believed that power should be held exclusively by certain chosen people - all the others were unreliable nobodies. In his posthumously published book 'The Prince' (1532), Machiavelli advocated the introduction of an unlimited dictatorship.

The Jesuits' Totalitarianism as a Prototype Some sources, above all Christian, claim that Weishaupt's ideological prototype was Plato's 'Republic'. These claims are misleading. Weishaupt (despite his hatred of them) admired the Jesuits' tactics, discipline and skill at organization, their ability to put talents to good use and their devotion to their cause. Since Jesuits educated Weishaupt, he was familiar with their experiences of creating totalitarian societies and his prototype was above all the totalitarian and theocratic rule, which the Jesuits enforced, in spite of the Spanish central power, in Paraguay in 1609.

This slave state existed officially for 159 years, up to 1768 when Weishaupt was a twenty-year-old student. The Jesuits called this serfdom encomienda, meaning mission or protection. The facts I found in Carl Morner's dissertation 'An Account of the History of Paraguay and the Pertaining Jesuit Missions from the Discovery of the Country to 1813' (Uppsala, 1858, pp. 92-102) call for consideration. According to Morner, every mission had a municipal council, which carried out the Jesuits' orders. The Jesuits followed a kind of communist method, using cunning and violence. Guarani Indians of both sexes and all ages were put to forced labour for the mission.

The Indians did not have any personal property. All the produce was gathered in communal storehouses. Whatever food and clothing the Indians needed, as well as the general needs of the commune, were distributed from these. The Jesuits oversaw the work in a factory manner. The Jesuits had introduced work duty.

The supply of food and other necessities to the Indians depended on the results of production. The power structure was centralised and work was performed in groups. The commune even organised entertainment. When punishment was meted out, the Indians were made to kiss the hand of their executioner, thank him and express their remorse. The commune leadership was comprised of Jesuit priests from Italy, England and Germany. They had cordoned off the area in a manner reminiscent of a ghetto or Eastern Europe behind the iron curtain. All this strengthened the idea that the Jesuits aspired to create an independent state.

'Savage' Indians from nearby areas were tempted into the enclosed communes with good food, kindness, parties and music. There was no suggestion of the coercion and servitude to come. Then the trap closed around them. The Jesuits distributed the 'savages' among the missions on the Parana River. Many fled home into the jungles only to be enslaved again later. The Indians were turned into helpless, dependent creatures.

Their chances for spiritual development were curbed. Special Jesuit priests (like politruks) indoctrinated the Indians not to express their dissatisfaction. Christianity, originally a religion intended for slaves, was used cunningly. At the same time, they tried to accustom the Indians to a militarist attitude and in this way they became the tools of their masters without any thought or will of their own. Paraguay was an example of standardisation, the 'right of co-determination', the factory mentality, communist methods, an iron curtain (the area was turned into a ghetto), politruks, servitude, violence, propaganda and militarism. An interesting fact is that primarily Central European Jesuits (of Jewish stock) were chosen as leaders of the Paraguay missions.

Information about the real conditions eventually reached the outside world despite all hypocrisy and double-dealing. In 1759, the Jesuits were ordered to release the Indians and abolish their isolation system. Naturally, the Jesuits claimed that all the accusations brought against them were false but they still admitted that something should be done and offered to help the Indians to gradually become independent again. They had no intention of keeping their promise.

Meanwhile, in Europe, the animosity against the Jesuit Order grew and King Carlos III of Spain expelled the Jesuits from all his provinces in 1767. The Jesuits in Paraguay shared the fate of their brothers. One year later, in 1768, they officially left their missions without resistance - missions, which had, through their communist way of life, stifled the spiritual development of the Indians. Thereby, the Jesuits had gathered experience of indoctrinating the exceedingly freedom-loving Indian nations, and of changing them into obedient slaves in their 'commune'.

Within only eight years, in 1776, the Jesuit defector Adam Weishaupt formed the Order of the Illuminati. In actual fact, the Jesuits kept their ghettos until well into the nineteenth century. Slavery was abolished in 1843. The Illuminati's First Coup d'Etat Adam Weishaupt also worked intensively as a member of the Masonic order Grand Orient to prepare a so-called revolution.

(Nesta Webster, 'The French Revolution', London, 1919, pp. 20-21.) At the same time, the Illuminati had gained a secure footing in France. A Portuguese Jew, Martinez Paschalis, had formed Illuminati groups all over the country up to 1787. Count Honore Gabriel Riqueti de Mirabeau (alias Leonidas) became the most important Illuminati leader. Another important Illuminatus, the writer and publisher Johann Joachim Christoph Bode (1730-1793), alias Amelius, had travelled to Paris in the same year to organise the French revolution and to give the go-ahead signal for the rebellion two years later, according to Johannes Rogalla von Bieberstein's book 'Die These von der Verschworung 1776-1945' (Frankfurt am Main, 1978). As an Illuminatus, Bode had been successful in making contacts with other freemasons, also in Sweden.

He published the first Masonic periodical during the years 1116-1119. He also took part in the Masonic convention in Wilhelmsbad in 1782. Weishaupt had earlier sent the Jew Giuseppe Balsamo (born 8th June 1743 in Palermo), who presented himself under the false title of Count Alessandro Cagliostro, to France so that the Illuminati would control the French Masonic orders. Cagliostro-Balsamo had been recruited in Frankfurt am Main in 1781.

('The Trail of the Serpent', Hawthorne, California, 1936, p. 163.) One year earlier he had declared himself leader of the Egyptian freemasonry. Cagliostro also took part in the important Masonic congress in Paris on the 15th February 1785. Cagliostro was expelled from France in 1786 in connection with the 'necklace affair'. He was jailed in Rome in 1789, after attempting to set up a Masonic lodge and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He died on the 26th August 1795. Rothschild's most important lackey, Weishaupt, was also sent to Paris with unlimited funds to bribe capable men, organise a revolt and depose the king.

A secret committee was set up at the Masonic convention in February 1785 to co-ordinate the actions of the revolution. It included Saint-Martin, Etrilla, Franz Anton Mesmer, Cagliostro, Mirabeau, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand (actually T. Perigord), Bode, Dahlberg, Baron de Gleichen, Lavater, Count Louis de Hesse, and representatives of the Grand Orient from Poland and Lithuania. ('The Trail of the Serpent', p. 73.) Weishaupt always played a leading role at the Illuminati's meetings in Paris. He invited thousands of murderers to Paris. Many lampoons against Queen Marie Antoinette began to circulate in Paris (Svenska Dagbladet, 27th September 1987).

After this, leaflets were spread to incite the people to revolt. The aim of the freemasons was to dethrone the king.

The propaganda machine was skilfully tended. Marie Antoinette became a symbol of all evil in the kingdom.

These so-called revolutionaries, who worked to undermine the established order, were often young and many among them were Jews or freemasons, according to the historian Henrik Berggren, Ph. (Dagens Syheter, 20th January 1987, Berggren's 'The Grammar of the Revolution'). The three hundred men who seized power under the French Revolution were all Illuminati. Winrod, 'Adam Weishaupt - a Human Devil', p.

37.) Marat and Robespierre officially belonged to a 'revolutionary' organization, The embittered. The Association of equals had also been active in Paris since 1786. This organization had, in the same year, already decided where to imprison the 'enemies of the people'. The revolutionary leaders Mirabeau, Garat, Robespierre, Marat, Danton, Desmoulins and many others were Illuminati, according to Gerald B. Winrod, 'Adam Weishaupt - a Human Devil' (p. According to Nesta Webster, Danton and Mirabeau were originally members of the Masonic lodge Les Amis Reunis (The Reunited Friends), upon which the Illuminati also put their mark. Louis Leon Saint-Just, called one of the fathers of totalitarianism, was also a freemason.

The Illuminati took over the Jacobin clubs already in 1789. 152 of these clubs were active on the 10th August 1790, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica. The Jacobins had a centralised network over all France. The first club was taken over by Weishaupt's close collaborators Bode and Baron de Busche. The Jacobin funds amounted to 30 million livres in 1791.

Honest researchers have pointed out that the history of the Jacobins is in fact a part of the history of the Illuminati. We must not forget that one of Weishaupt's titles was 'Patriarch of the Jacobins'.

The Jacobins also wore red caps, which they called 'caps of liberty' or Jacobin caps. According to the still current propaganda, Louis XVI was a merciless and stupid tyrant. In actual fact, he was a kind, well-meaning person, a warmly religious family man and, besides, extremely clever and well-read, according to the French historian Eric Le Nabour's biography of the king, 'Le pouvoir et la fatalite' ('Power and Destiny'). He often read his encyclopedias. Louis was so near-sighted that he had difficulty recognising people only a few yards away.

He was a good locksmith and had a knowledge of mechanics, which surprised contemporary experts. He liked carpentry and woodwork.

The king had no interest in the glamorous aspects of court life. Louis was 16 when he married the 14-year-old Marie Antoinette. He never travelled abroad.

The Illuminati have managed to present as negative a picture of Louis XVI and his France as possible to the post-revolutionary world. It was not the extravagance and wasteful spending of the court that caused the enormous state deficit, but rather France's support of the American Revolution. The costs of the war against England became astronomical. Louis XVI was the first head of state of the Old World to recognise this new republic. Gustavus III was the second. Louis XVI had reformed the judicial system, abolished torture in 1788, humanised the prisons and developed the health service.

He paved the way for the fall of the monarchy through constant, small concessions to the freemasons and the Illuminati. The revolution was not organised in a destitute country, but in a flourishing nation.

France's exports had multiplied ten times during the century. Industry and agriculture had made great advances. The French network of more than 40,000 kilometres of stone-paved roads was admired by an amazed world. (Rene Sedillot, 'Le cout de la Revolution francaise' / 'The Cost of the French Revolution', Paris, 1986.) A presage of the catastrophe to come occurred almost exactly a year earlier, on the morning of the 13th July 1788, when a great storm swept across the country.

In a few minutes, the temperature dropped 13 degrees, the sun was hidden and hailstones the size of a baby's head swept over the richest farming country in the land - 900,000 hectares were affected, trees were uprooted, vineyards destroyed and harvests spoiled. Over a thousand villages suffered. Roofs blew off and church steeples were brought down. It was not long before the superstitious were proved right - it was a terrible sign of calamity and violent, sudden death. Neither was it a good sign that the price of bread began to rise day by day, hordes of beggars moved along the roads and over 100,000 destitute people found their way to Paris.

Another bad omen was that the winter of 1788-1789 in France was extremely severe. The harbour of Marseille froze over. All traffic between Dover and Calais stopped. The mills iced over and could not grind flour, so that the shortage of bread became disastrous. This is why the populace could be incited to revolt.

The riots went on throughout the winter. On the 1st of March 1789, the 19-year-old lieutenant Napoleon Bonaparte was sent to Dijon to crush a riot but he refused to take the king's side.

He chose to go over to the revolutionaries. Dark Illuminati forces fomented the riots in the French countryside.

The debts owed on the state deficit consumed half of the French budget. All this money found its way into the hands of profiteering Jewish moneylenders. All of these factors were exploited. The time to strike had come for the conspirators, who had united the Jacobin clubs. As a kind of prelude, Mirabeau called in the Estates-General on May 5th 1789, just after the thirteenth anniversary of the Illuminati's founding. Marx described Mirabeau as the 'lion of the revolution'. At the beginning of the revolution, there were 282 Masonic lodges in France, of which 266 were controlled by the Illuminati, according to Nesta Webster ('World Revolution', London, 1921, p.

It was these same groups which organised all the riots and troubles. On the 13th of July 1789, at 11 o'clock, the conspirators gathered at the church of Prix Saint-Antoine where they set up a revolutionary committee and discussed how to organise the revolutionary militia. Dufour from the Grand Orient chaired the meeting. Even the fall of the Bastille was planned by these freemasons, according to Gustave Bord's testimony. Ivanov, 'The Secrets of Freemasonry', Moscow, 1992, p.

120.) On the following day, July 14th, people were incited to head for the Bastille fortress with axes in their hands. Contrary to what the Illuminati's myths say about it, there was no storming and capture of the Bastille. It simply capitulated to the threats of four freemasons. In this way the Bastille was taken. Actually, it was quite meaningless to take the Bastille - the authorities had already decided to demolish it to build a housing area. Not a single political prisoner was found in the Bastille.

There were only seven people incarcerated there. Four of these were infamous frauds and forgers. The young Comte des Solages had been imprisoned at his father's bidding since he had committed serious offences (incest). Two of the Bastille inmates were mentally ill; one of these was an Irishman with a three foot long beard who claimed to be God himself. The revolutionaries continued to mislead the people by showing them a printing press, which they claimed, was an instrument of torture.

They also asserted that an old suit of armour had been used as a straitjacket for refractory prisoners. Actually, the prisoners had had it fairly easy. They had their own furniture and were allowed to wear their normal clothes. They were also served several courses for dinner. The dungeons had been used to store wine. The warders had been decent, and visits from friends and relatives had frequently been allowed. The library was of a high standard.

The daily walks in the little garden of the Bastille had been pleasant. The freemasons, headed by Camille Desmoulins, agitated the people more and more intensively with shouts of 'Down with the Bastille!' The tumult cost 83 attackers their lives. Another 73 were injured, of which 15 later died of their injuries (Svenska Dagbladet, 25th June 1989).

Earlier, the liberal governor had even invited the freemasons' messenger to dinner! He was tortured and killed by the crowd. His head was cut off and carried in triumph on a pole through Paris. Afterwards, three officers were murdered and two invalids were hanged. The 'revolutionaries' waved their red flags.

Afterwards, agents of the freemasons were sent out across the country. Their main task was to foster panic simultaneously in most of the provinces. During this summer of famine, they began to spread lies in different cities and villages about the roaming bands of beggars and unemployed, calling them bandits and arsonists who killed women and children. They also lied about an impending attack by the Germans and the English. Within 36 hours these evil rumours had reached the great masses around the country and created an enormous panic on the 22nd of July.

The leaflets appeared to be official declarations. They would read: 'By order of his Majesty, the burning of all castles and the hanging of anyone who opposes this is allowed from the 1st August until the 1st November.' People were taken in by these lies. The peasants took up arms. They attacked and plundered manors and castles. They burned terriers and other documents and thereby also burned their own history.

Behind the idea of the 'Day of Terror' was the freemason Adrien Dupont, who wanted to exploit the people as much as he could for 'revolutionary' reasons, according to Nesta Webster ('World Revolution', London, 1921, pp. To speed up their own seizure of power, the freemasons checked any attempted reforms. The National Assembly was moved into an old manege on the Rue de Rivoli in October 1789. The radicals sat to the left of the chairman, the conservatives to the right. Hence the Illuminati created left and right as ideological concepts in world politics. Everything that had to do with the left was thereafter considered progressive since it was true Illuminism. The murders began under Rothschild's red banner and the Illuminist slogans: 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!'

And 'Freedom or Death!' In Lyon the 'enemies of the people' were shot down with cannons, in Nantes, following the slaughter of 500 children, 144 seamstresses were drowned in old barges on the Loire River. Their 'crime': they had sewn shirts for the army. People were executed without trial, despite the ostensible introduction of so-called revolutionary tribunals in September 1789. One of the judges presiding at these tribunals was the perverted Marquis Donatien Alphonse Francois de Sade, who had been brought straight from a mental hospital. De Sade was responsible for giving the concept 'sadism' a name. He also died in a mental hospital.

The Illuminist coup in France brought none of the improvements that corrupt historians try to make us believe in; instead it resulted in an orgy of violence and intrigue. To make the killing more efficient, the 'revolutionaries' began using the guillotine in April 1792. The idea originally came from Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, a professor in anatomy.

The doctor and freemason Antoine Louis constructed the killing machine. The record of Henri Samson, the chief executioner, was 21 heads in 38 minutes.

The real reign of terror, however, began on the 10th of August 1792, which was a Yahweh day, when the monarchy was abolished and the Paris commune was established. The commune leadership included 288 Illuminati headed by Chaumette, Danton and Robespierre. The leaders of the Jacobins and especially of the Enraged (Les Enrages) wanted to destroy all who had shown any misgivings about the 'revolution'.

Georges Jacques Danton, infamous as a rogue, became minister of justice. He wanted every suspect imprisoned. Many priests and relatives of emigrants were also incarcerated. In this way the leaders of the revolution gained access to enormous assets. Danton himself became incredibly rich.

Earlier, he had taken large bribes from those wishing to save their lives. In the beginning of September 1792, Danton encouraged the mobs to massacre the 'enemies of the people'. In Paris alone, 2800 people were murdered between the 2nd and 4th of September, according to the historian Nesta Webster. Among the victims of this bloodbath was a friend of the queen, Princess de Lamballe, who was attacked in the street and hacked to pieces. Every aristocrat was automatically guilty, but only those who threatened the Jacobins' position perished. The Jacobins had begun to shut the Masonic lodges - they had played their part.

In 1794 there were only 12 lodges left, those most useful to the Illuminati. The king's cousin, the Duke of Orleans, who had begun to call himself Philippe Egalite (equality) was also guillotined despite having renounced his title and in 1792 leaving his position as Grand Master of the Grand Orient which he had held for 20 years since the founding of the Order. He knew too much about the preparations for the revolution. He had worked with the Jacobins in the hope that he might be allowed to take the throne as a constitutional monarch. Philippe Egalite explained why he left the Grand Orient in the following manner: '.I no longer know who belongs to the Grand Orient. Therefore, I believe that the Republic should no longer allow any secret societies. I no longer want to have anything to do with the Grand Orient and Masonic meetings.'

The Illuminati could not forgive this and exacted their revenge upon him, despite the fact that his vote had been decisive in the process of deposing the king. Nothing was said about guilty peasants and workers but it was mainly they who suffered from the 'revolutionary' punishments. Marat wanted 100,000 people guillotined to scare the enemies of the 'revolution'.

Saint - Just promised in the name of the republic to eliminate all adversaries. The Jacobins' (Illuminati's) terrorism claimed 300,000 human lives, according to Nesta Webster ('World Revolution', London, 1921, p. The historian Rene Sedillot, in his book 'The Cost of the French Revolution', calculates that the 'revolution', on account of the terrorism and the civil war, claimed at least 600,000 victims. Charlotte Corday murdered the powerful and bloodthirsty freemason Marat on the 13th of July 1793. Less than one in ten of those guillotined were aristocrats.

This was revealed just before the 200th anniversary of the revolution. This information is based on the protocols of the revolutionary tribunals, which include the names of all those executed. Nine per cent of the decapitated 'enemies of the people' were nobles, 28 per cent peasants and 30 per cent workers. The rest were servants.

(Dagens Nyheter, 1st July 1989.) In other words, those killed were quite ordinary people. In Paris alone, 30 people were executed every day. The Jacobin executioners usually preferred blonde victims. In 1903, Lenin proclaimed: 'A Russian social democrat must be a Jacobin.' This was just the beginning. After the 'revolution' came the wars.

The Jacobins explained in their inflammatory speeches how 'a war would be a blessing for the nation. The worst thing that could happen to us now would be if we did not get a war'. On the 20th of April 1792, France declared war on Austria. After that, Belgium, Holland and parts of Germany were invaded. All those wars claimed two million lives. All of France's 27 million inhabitants were made to suffer from this madness. With the help of French 'revolutionary' troops, the Republic or Commune of Mainz, Germany, was proclaimed on the 18th of March, 1793.

The 18th of March had a special significance for the Illuminist conspirators. On the same day in 1314, the Jewish Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay, was burned at the stake. Because of this, some of the more important Illuminati actions were planned for just this day, as a kind of revenge for his execution. Revolts were organised to break out on the 18th of March, 1848, in several European countries. A coup was staged in Paris on this day (1871) after which the Illuminati proclaimed the Paris Commune. Thanks to the efforts of the Prussian army, the snake-pit in Mainz was liquidated only four months later - on the 23rd of July 1793. Goethe accompanied the Prussian army as early as 1792 in its campaign against the 'lawless Frenchmen'.

(Dagens Nyheter, 4th of February 1989.) On the 17th of January 1795, a revolutionary 'sister-state' was founded in the Netherlands - the republic of Batavia, where Amsterdam became the capital. Napoleon oversaw the conversion of this state into the kingdom of Holland in 1806. Jewish 'revolutionaries' immediately saw to it that the Jews received full citizenship and so that they had their hands free to act. Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre (1758-1794) published a work entitled 'To Protect the Political Rights of the Jews' as early as in 1789. Protection of Jewish rights was obviously considered the main priority. Louis Joseph Marchand, friend of Napoleon Bonaparte, wrote in 1895 that Robespierre was actually a Jew by the name of Ruban from Alsace ('In Napoleon's Shadow,' San Francisco, 1998). The slogan which best summed up the Jacobins' aims was: 'All power to the bourgeoisie!'

(the Illuminati). And the power certainly became centralised in France, according to Leo Gershoy, 'The Era of the French Revolution 1789-1799' (New York, 1957, p. Everything that was non-essential was suddenly presented as essential. However, the Buddhist work Dhammapada (11-12) says of this. Those who take the non-real for the real and the real for the non-real and thus fall victims to erroneous notions never reach the essence of reality.

Having realised the essential as the essential and the non-essential as the non-essential, they by thus following correct thinking attain the essential. Illuminist Jews saw to it that everything that was good about France was destroyed during the 'revolution'. What was good disappeared at the same rate that the evil grew. The road network was allowed to fall into disrepair, overseas trade ceased almost entirely and it took until 1809 for the industrial production to reach its pre-Revolutionary levels again, according to the historian Rene Sedillot ('Le cout de la Revolution francaise' / 'The Cost of the French Revolution'). Many villages were razed to the ground, churches and castles were destroyed on purpose.

The cultural heritage was ravaged, including medieval buildings. The largest Romanesque architectural structure, the 10th century abbey in Cluny, was destroyed. Only one tower remains today.

Those barbarians even began to tear down the Papal Palace in Avignon. The steeple on the Notre-Dame of Paris was considered offensively tall and was torn down. At the same time, the 'revolutionaries' began to plunder castles of their art treasures.

The Jewish writer Anatole France described in his book 'The Thirsty Gods' how inspectors with tricolour ribbons around their collars began to turn up at the homes of the wealthy to search for riches. Delighted foreign art dealers bought sculptures and fragments of frescoes. Load after load of confiscated art collections were shipped over the English Channel. The 'revolution' was lucrative for the Illuminati and the speculators.

All of this was repeated during and after the so-called Russian revolution. The mighty finance dynasty of the Rothschilds was born out of the French 'revolution'. The Rothschilds are still in control behind the scenes today, especially within the European Union. The government reached a deficit that made the pre-Revolutionary debts seem quite modest in comparison.

The debt equalled 800 tons of gold, or 40 per cent of the total gold production of the world during the entire 18th century. The real losers in the 'revolution' were the Illuminati's tools - the simple people.

The land rights of the small peasants were taken away. The church charities ceased abruptly and any attempt at improving the conditions for loan-takers was regarded as a conspiracy against the state. The ranks of derelicts swelled.

During Napoleon's days one in five Parisians lived by begging. The myth maintains that this was done to throw off the yoke of tyranny and to protect human rights. In actual fact, the Illuministic reign of terror abolished human rights altogether.

It became forbidden for workers to organise and strike for better conditions. This prohibition was legislated on the 14th of June 1791. (Etienne Martin-Saint-Leon, 'Les deux C.G.T., syndicalisme et communisme', Paris, 1923, p.

7.) The theatres were given free rein at the beginning, but later the actors began to be punished for undesirable productions. The Academy of Art was closed and anyone who wanted could call himself an artist. Anyone was allowed to be a doctor and to mix medicines, which had a very negative effect on the state of general health in France - but then, maybe this was the intention? The 21st of January 1793, the Jewish chief executioner and freemason, Samson, and Samson's son Henry executed Louis XVI. Samson said: 'Louis, son of the holy one, rise up to heaven!'

The execution of the king was celebrated every year until Napoleon's coup in Bruimare (November) 1799. (Dagens Nyheter, 25th January 1989.) Even the word 'roi' (king) was abolished.

Marie Antoinette was executed on the 16th of October (Yahweh's Doomsday) in 1793. The young Hungarian philosopher Ferenc Feher, Lukacs's disciple, living in New York, claimed in 1989 that Louis XVI was judged on political, not judicial, grounds. Because of this, he ascertained that it was terrorism, not democracy that was introduced. Feher believed that what was built up after the French revolution was simply unfounded lawlessness. (Expressen, 21st of August 1989.) The playwright Eugene Ionesco observed in 1990 that this revolution was a big mistake, which led to the spread of the most terrible false doctrine in history. The Illuminati wanted to completely politicise society.

This was the job of the 'insinuating brothers' under the name of the 'Committee of National Security' with its chief Chauvelin. At the same time, society was being undermined through the secret lodges, which began to prepare a dictatorship and a world revolution, which was intended to utterly overthrow the social order. This world revolution was designed to be accomplished by a handful of Illuminist conductors.

(Svenska Dagbladet, 16th August 1989.) The homosexual Robespierre was publicly regarded as a tyrant or dictator. The new rulers demanded that the populace address all as 'citizens'. The year was to begin upon a new day, the months were renamed, and the week became a 10-day period. An hour consisted of 100 minutes. All these idiocies were abolished by Napoleon in 1806. The peasants in the Vendee province had had enough of all this 'revolutionary' stupidity: their king had been murdered, schooling had been abolished, their oldest sons had all been enrolled into the army. On the 10th of March 1793, they rebelled.

At the beginning they were quite successful but when the Jacobins realised that the populace was beginning to threaten their position, they imposed their dictatorship, which began on the 31st of May 1793, and lasted until March 1794. The terrorism during that period was the worst yet seen. Virtually rampaging marauders murdered everyone in the province of Vendee. Only 12,000 people in the whole province survived the assaults. One general reported to Paris: 'Vendee has ceased to exist.' Another wrote that his band of army raiders daily managed to kill 2,000 people.

A new rebellion went on during the years 1794-95. In total, 600,000 lives were extinguished in the Vendee province. In their struggle for power, some 'revolutionaries' even happened to execute each other. Some leaders, above all those who wanted to limit the extent of the terrorism, were done away with (Georges Danton, Camille Desmoulins and other Dantonites went to the guillotine on the 5th of April 1794 as 'enemies of the people').

This awful end also awaited Robespierre. On the 27th of July 1794, the leader of the Jacobins was arrested together with other leading Communards (his brother Augustin, Saint-Just and Georges Gouthon) and was guillotined without trial. The reign of terror was over. The directors dissolved the Paris Commune on the 26th of October 1795. The famous French historian Urbain Gohier revealed in his book 'The Old France' (1922) how a certain speech, which Robespierre held for two hours at the convention on the 26th of July 1794, had meant his end. He condemned all the eager foreign agents who tried to direct the development of commerce in France too intensively and demanded that those agents be rendered harmless.

On the following day he was arrested together with his brother, Saint-Just and Georges Gouthon. All of them were executed without trial on the 28th of July. This speech has been left out of the official version of events.

Officially, the 'revolutionaries' justified their craving for power as 'moral', but the people were forced to be 'virtuous' and to change their minds. These experiences were exploited later in Russia when the Illuminati, who called themselves Bolsheviks, paid homage to the men responsible for this revolutionary terrorism: a statue of Robespierre (Ruban), whose family had immigrated to France from Ireland, was erected and a massive armoured cruiser (as well as several factories) were given the name Marat (actually Mosessohn). What have Jewish ideologues said about this 'revolution' in France? Archives Israelites admitted very ambiguously on the 6th of June 1889: 'The French Revolution has a very expressive Hebraic character.' The aim of this new politics, pursued for the people's (the Illuminati's) own best, was indubitably totalitarian (Svenska Dagbladet, 14th March 1989). Later, the question arose whether this conspiracy to overthrow the church and the state had begun somewhere in Germany (Svenska Dagbladet, 16th august 1989).

Other states now sought to defend themselves against Illuminism. The Turks dismissed suggestions from Russia to take a joint action against France. Gustavus III was also prepared to send 16,000 Swedish soldiers to help forge a European alliance to crush the French Revolution.

He banned the Marseillaise in Sweden. Because of this, the earlier decision to murder the king was carried out. On the 16th of March 1792, Gustavus III was fatally wounded at a masked ball by the freemason Jakob Johan Anckarstrom.

The king had been warned about possible assassination attempts but had not taken these warnings seriously. A bust of Anckarstrom stands in the lodge chamber of the Grand Orient in Paris. In 1818 the freemasons put one of their agents from France on the Swedish throne - Jean Baptiste Bernadotte. The Illuminati's Way to World Power Despite occasional setbacks (through Napoleon's treachery) the Illuminati continued on their way to gaining world power. Queen Marie Antoinette had warned her brother, Emperor Leopold II, about this in a letter: 'Be very careful of the Masonic lodges; you may already have been told about these. The beasts here count on achieving their aims in all countries. Protect my fatherland and yourself from such a fate!'

The international Illuminati leaders held a conference in New York in 1850. They made preparations to start an International.

An American committee was set up. Clinton Roosevelt, Horace Greeley and Charles Dana became its leaders.

Another group was formed to co-ordinate acts off terrorism. The Italian Jew Giuseppe Mazzini (born 1805 in Genoa) was selected to lead this group. He had been an Illuminatus since 1837 and was a freemason of the highest (33rd) degree. He assumed leadership of the Bavarian Illuminati.

After Mazzini's death in 1872 his position was taken over by the Jew Adriano Lemmi, who was a revolutionary conspirator and Grand Master of the Grand Orient in Italy. The first enthusiast for Illuminism in Italy was Count Filippo Struzzi, who founded many lodges around Italy and acted as their leader. (Charles William Heckethorn, 'Secret Societies', Moscow, 1993, p. 206.) Giuseppe Garibaldi was also an Illuminatus. The members of the Garibaldi movement wore red shirts.

Terrible atrocities began to take place in Italy, France, Spain, Austria and Russia after the aforementioned conference. Mazzini had the Duke of Parma murdered in 1854, as well as the judges who sentenced the murderers. Violent anarchists raged about until the beginning of the First World War.

Tens of thousands of people lost their lives. The world was to be divided into different blocks, which were to be put into violent opposition to each other. This operation was controlled from London. On the 29th of July 1900, King Umberto I was murdered by the freemason Gaetano Bresci in Monza, despite the fact that he was a member of the lodge Savoia Illuminata. The murderer Bresci belonged to an American lodge in Paterson, New Jersey. In 1861, Abraham Lincoln was elected president of the U.S.A. He became a stumbling block to the Illuminati, however.

First, the Civil War was started (the Confederacy was funded by Illuminist France). The Illuminati had worked hard to get the United States to use the same banking system as the European countries, where private banks handled the issuing of money so that governments were forced to incur debt at high interest rates. Lincoln opposed this and refused to give the Rothschild bank control over the American economy. Hence, the Jewish Illuminatus John Wilkes Booth murdered him on the 15th of April 1865 in Washington, only a few days after the end of the war. Lincoln's murderer was also disposed of. Benjamin, Rothschild's agent, lurked behind Booth.

(William Guy Carr, 'The Red Fog Over America', 1968, p. 194.) The Confederate general Albert Pike (born on December 19, 1809 in Boston) became, as a freemason, a member of the American Illuminati group towards the end of the 1850s. Mazzini's revolutionary activities (anarchic violence) brought discredit on the Grand Orient. Therefore, Mazzini suggested the founding of a new, extremely secret organization, the Palladium.

No mention of it would ever be made in the assemblies of the Lodges and Inner Shrines of other rites. For the secret of the new institution was only to be divulged with the greatest caution to a chosen few belonging to the ordinary high grades, according to the historian Domenico Margiotta in his book 'Adriano Lemmi' (Grenoble, 1894, p.

Giuseppe Mazzini sent a letter to Albert Pike on the 22nd of January 1870, in which he wrote among other things: 'With this highest rite, we shall rule all freemasonry; it will become the international centre which will make us all the more mighty because its leadership is unknown.' The same Albert Pike set up this extremely secret organization, which was called The New and Reformed Palladian Rite. The organization first had three important centres: Charleston in the United States of America, Rome in Italy and Berlin in Germany. Through Mazzini's work, the organization set up altogether 23 subordinate councils at strategic locations around the world. Palladianism actually became a satanic cult. This cult, or religion, worshipped Lucifer as a god.

Its oath proves this: 'The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.' General Pike was an exceptionally evil man. During the American Civil War, when he served under the Confederate flag, his army, composed of Indian bands from different tribes, perpetrated such atrocious massacres that Great Britain threatened to enter the war 'for humanitarian reasons'. Consequently, the Confederate president Jefferson Davis (1809-1889) was forced to intervene against his own general and disband his troops. After the civil war, Pike was taken to trial and sentenced to prison for his crimes. The freemasons immediately turned to President Andrew Johnson, who was a freemason himself (Greenville Lodge No.

On 22 April 1866, President Johnson pardoned him. The following day, Pike visited the president in the White House.

Johnson was subordinate to Pike within freemasonry. The press was not informed about this event until nine months later. Still, 'New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies', Lafayette, Louisiana, 1990, p. 123.) Albert Pike was one of the founders of the infamous racist organization, the Ku Klux Klan.

He was the first Grand Dragon of the Klan and wrote the anthem and the rules of the organization. The freemasons have erected a monument in honour of Albert Pike in Judiciary Square in central Washington D.C.

The plaque on the statue presents Pike as a 'soldier' and a 'poet'. Albert Pike monument in Judiciary Square in central Washington D.C. Albert Pike was very enamoured with the idea of world dominion. In time, he became an Illuminatus of the highest (33rd) degree and in his mansion in Little Rock, he made plans to gain control over the world with the aid of three world wars and several revolutions.

In a letter to Mazzini, dated the 15th of August 1871, Pike broadly outlines his long-term plan for the seizure of power in the whole world. One might expect the Illuminati to be more careful with their papers, so that their plans were not made public - but anyone who knows their history also knows that humanity will never take warning in time. Professor Carroll Quigley (also an Illuminatus) realised this.

Public opinion, the majority of politicians, and social scientists are at any event unable to accept facts, which contradict their deeply held belief that they understand and control all that happens in society. Both Lenin and Hitler openly revealed their real aims years before they ever came to power. Did the nations heed the warning?

No, they preferred to go on sleeping. It is no different today. The Illuminati know this. Pike's plan was ingeniously simple. The inherent antagonism between different ideologies was to be stirred up and made to explode in three world wars and three revolutions. The First World War was to destroy the three European empires, at that time being the last remaining bulwarks against Illuminism.

One of these (Russia) was to be made a centre of atheist totalitarianism (Communism). The Second World War was to erupt from heightened tensions between the Jewish race (and its spiteful Zionism) and extreme European nationalism (Nazism and Fascism). This war would weaken Europe economically and politically and Communism would expand and become as strong as all Christendom, but not stronger, until the time was up for the final destruction of society. A third reason for the Second World War was to create a Jewish state in Palestine. Gradually, it would be possible to thereby heighten the tensions between Judaism and Islam until they broke out in a war which would bring in all of the world powers. The three revolutions, which would aid this carefully planned dissolution of all human civilisations, were the Russian, the Chinese and the Indo-Chinese.

The historian Domenico Margiotta published the letter in his book ('Le Palladisme: Culte de Satan-Lucifer', Grenoble, 1895, p. The reader will realise that most of this evil plan has already become reality. Concerning the last stage, General Pike wrote the following. 'We shall unleash the Nihilists and Atheists and provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. 'Nothing happens by chance in politics. If something happens, you can be sure it was planned that way.' Albert Pike worked hard to make the freemasonry more efficient.

Among other reforms, he admitted women as members. Over the years, the Illuminati have moved their headquarters between different cities. In the 1870s it was in Frankfurt am Main. According to Nordisk Familjebok it was in Berlin in 1907. Brockhaus Enzyklopadie (Wiesbaden, 1970) stated that the Illuminati were legalised in 1896. Their leader then was Leopold Engel, who published the Illuminati's history in 1906 ('Geschichte des Illuminatenordens').

According to 'Meyers Enzyklopadisches Lexikon', the various national Illuminati groups combined to form a world association in 1925. According to Store Norske Lexikon (Oslo, 1979, Vol. 183), the Illuminati still continue their activities as a secret organization. The Illuminati's headquarters moved to Switzerland during the First World War and to New York after the Second World War (The Harold Pratt building, 58, East 68th Street). The Rockefellers now funded the Illuminati instead of the Rothschilds. (William Guy Carr, 'Pawns in the Game'.) An especially useful tool of the Illuminati in the 20th century has been the I.

Farben company, led by its Jewish chief Max Warburg. Today, the Illuminati control the whole Masonic movement. They also control Rotary, Lions, B'nai B'rith, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg group, Skull & Bones, Bohemian Club and similar groups. Rotary International was founded by Paul Harris (member of B'nai B'rith) in Chicago in 1905. The Lions Club was also founded by B'nai B'rith in Chicago in 1917.

There are more than six million freemasons (3315 lodges) in the world today (four million in the United States of America, 600,000 in Great Britain, 70,000 in France). In Sweden there are 16,000 divided into 56 lodges. A sarcastic survey of various networks was published in the respected magazine The Economist on the 26th of December 1992. The Illuminati were presented as the 'mother of all networks' and 'the True Rulers of the World'. The magazine names Adam Weishaupt and the 1st of May 1776, and states that the Illuminati's 'conspiracy is immense and terrifying' and that 'it is the network of those who run networks.' Then they go on to point out that many American presidents have been Illuminati; some of them have been killed by the Illuminati and the Illuminati symbol - that of the eye in the pyramid - still graces the dollar bill. I found this symbol in the summer of 1986 among other Illuminati documents in the Ingolstadt archives.

It was the American president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, freemason of the 32nd degree, who ordered the seal to be printed on American one dollar bills in 1933, 144 years after Congress had accepted this seal. The seal symbolises that the Illuminati claim to control America, no matter who the president is. • The year MDCCLXXVI on the pyramid stands for 1776, when the Order of the Illuminati was founded, but also when the American Republic was proclaimed. • The pyramid represents the conspiracy to establish a world government. • The All-seeing eye symbolises the secret police that Weishaupt called the 'insinuating brothers'.

• Annuit Coeptis means 'He has nodded assent to (our) plans'. • Novus Ordo Seclorum means 'New World Order'. The Illuminati apparently felt so safe that The Economist (their own publication) was allowed to publish this information.

In contrast, there is not a single word about the Illuminati in the new Swedish National Encyclopedia. This book outlines how the Illuminati's most important ideology - Communism - was spread using guile and violence. The author reveals numerous lies which uninformed people have swallowed in good faith. The Illuminati knew their business. The French socialist and Illuminatus Louis Blanc called Weishaupt the most skillful conspirator through the ages. Illuminati symbology on one dollar bill Telling the story of the rise of Communism means revealing the histories of the worst of the criminals involved at the time. But this is necessary, for without knowledge of the secrets of evil, we cannot properly develop the good, either.

As the Swedish philosopher Henry T. Laurency wrote: 'Only he who knows evil knows good.'

Then we shall appreciate goodness above everything else on earth. Then we may really be able to welcome the truth, even if it is frightening and dismiss lies, even if they are pleasant. ZioNazi snake devouring the Earth KARL MARX - EVIL'S IDOL On the 5th of May 1818, in the German town of Trier, a baby boy was born and given the name Moses Mordecai Levi Marx. In his early youth, he became known as a Christian. His father, Hirschel ha-Levi Marx, Justice of the Supreme Court, had opportunistically converted to Christianity in 1816. Hirschel's father was a famous Chief Rabbi in Cologne. His father-in-law was also a rabbi.

The historian Richard Laufner proved in 1975 that Karl Marx was not born into a Christian family, as they had secretly kept their Jewish faith. This is why he was given a Mosaic name just after his birth. Moses Mordecai Levi was only baptised in 1824, at six years of age, and given the Christian name Karl Heinrich. Young Marx went to a Jesuit school, which had been restructured as a secular high school. At the same time, he went to a Talmudic school, where he learned that the Jews must rule the world.

Bernard Lazar (Lazana), (1865-1903), a well-known functionary and publicist within Judaism, confirmed that Marx had been affected by Talmudism. In August 1835, Marx wrote his examination essay for religious studies: 'The Union of the Faithful in Jesus'. In it he wrote, among other things, the following.

'Through our love of Christ, we turn our hearts simultaneously towards our brothers, who are spiritually bound to us and for whom He gave himself as a sacrifice.' (Marx and Engels, 'Collected Works', Volume I, New York, 1979.) In his examination essay in German, 'Considerations of a Young Man on Choosing his Career', he admitted: 'Religion itself teaches us that the Ideal towards which all strive has sacrificed Himself for humanity, and who shall dare contradict such claims?' After high school, he studied at the University of Bonn and later, in the autumn of 1836, in Berlin, but he took his doctorate in Jena, where the requirements were lower than in Berlin. As a young student, Karl Marx went through a total transformation. He began to hate God. This was something he admitted in his brutal poetry.

Two of Marx's poems were published during his lifetime in the periodical Athenaeum in Berlin, under the title 'Wild Songs', on the 23rd of January 1841. Forty poems and the verse drama 'Oulanem' written by Marx (the title is an anagram of Emanuel, meaning God is with us) have been found to date. He wrote the latter at eighteen years of age.

But no one cared about his poetry, which had mostly to do with the end of the world and his love for the girl next door, Jenny von Westphalen. In his poems he threatened to revenge himself upon God and time after time expressed his hatred for the world. He vowed to throw humanity into the abyss and follow after with laughter on his lips. He flung terrible curses at humanity. He did not become an atheist, though.

In his poem 'Der Spielmann' ('The Fiddler'), he admitted: With Satan I have struck my deal. That art God neither wants nor wists, It leaps to the brain from Hell's black mists.

Till heart's bewitched, till senses reel: With Satan I have struck my deal. In another of his poems, Marx promised to lure mankind with him into hell in the company of Satan.

These words are reminiscent of Jakob Frank's expressions. This shows that Marx was affected by Frankism.

Karl Marx's father had come into contact with Frankism and had also instructed his children in this ideology. This is how young Marx got to know of Frankism, as was mirrored in his poetry. His family's conversion to Christianity was just a social manoeuvre. Jakob Frank himself had done the same, when he became a 'Catholic'. Frank had, in his turn, followed the dreaded Sabbatai Zevi's example of 'changing religion' for the sake of the cause. Marx was delighted with the idea of humanity's moral ruination. In his poetry, he dreamed of a pact with Satan.

He was especially fascinated by violence. Later, in his own ideology, he stressed that one must fight violence with violence. He called humanity 'the apes of the cold god'. Marx's religion is clearly revealed in his poem 'Invocation of One in Despair' (Karl Marx, 'Collected Works', Vol. I, New York, 1974). So a god has snatched from me my all In the curse and rack of destiny. All his worlds are gone beyond recall!

Nothing but revenge is left to me. I shall build my throne high overhead, Cold, tremendous shall its summit be. For its bulwark - superstitious dread.

For its Marshal - blackest agony. Who looks on it with a healthy eye, Shall turn back, deathly pale and dumb, Clutched by blind and chill mortality, May his happiness prepare its tomb. Here is the ending of the drama 'Oulanem' (from Robert Payne's 'The Unknown Karl Marx', New York University Press, 1971): Perished, with no existence - that would be really living. 'History is the judge, the proletariat its executioner.' (Paul Johnson, 'The Intellectuals', Stockholm, 1989, p.

74.) Marx found great pleasure in talking about terror, about houses marked with red crosses indicating that the inhabitants were to be killed. Moses Hess - the Teacher of Marx and Engels Karl Marx's worship of violence was strengthened by a Frankist communist whom he met in 1841, when he was 23 years old. This man was called Moritz Moses Hess. Moses Hess was born on the 21st of June 1812 in Bonn, the son of a wealthy Jewish industrialist. He died on the 6th of April 1875 in Paris and is buried in Israel. It can be mentioned that he founded the German Social Democratic Party. In 'Judisches Lexikon' (Berlin, 1928, pp.

1577-78) he is called a communist rabbi and the father of modern Socialism. In 1841, he founded the newspaper Rheinische Zeitung and one year later he made the 24 year-old Marx its editor. Theodor Zlocist published an interesting book about him in 1921, 'Moses Hess, der Vorkampfer des Sozialismus und Zionismus'. Part of Moses Hess' terrifying world of ideas is disclosed in his book 'Rome and Jerusalem'. 'Attempts by masses to carry out Communist ideas can be answered by a cannon as soon as they have become dangerous.'

He then believed these ideas to be impracticable. Moses Hess essentially corrected all these opinions. He became the grey eminence behind Marx, intensively guiding and influencing his protege's work.

In Paris, in the autumn of 1844, Moses Hess presented the 26-year-old Marx to the half-Jew Friedrich Engels, who was two years younger. This meeting laid the foundations for their long collaboration.

Engels had also expressed Christian ideas in his youth. 'I thirsted for a connection with God.

My religion was and is a peaceful and blessed world and I should be pleased with it if it were to be with me also after my funeral. I have no reason to suppose God should take it away from me. Religious persuasion is a thing of the heart. I pray every day, indeed almost all day, for truth. I seek the truth everywhere, even where I hope to find just a shadow of it.

Tears are welling forth as I write this. I am moved through and through, but I feel I will not be lost. I will come to God, for whom my whole soul longs.' (Marx and Engels, 'From Early Works', Moscow, 1956, p. 306.) But Engels fell, after he happened to meet Moses Hess in Cologne.

After this meeting Hess wrote. 'He parted from me as an over-zealous Communist. This is how I produce ravages.' (Moses Hess, 'Selected Works', Cologne, 1962.) It was this same Moses Hess who thought up the rancorous basis of the socialist-communist ideology. He was also the first to recommend, as a fundamental idea, that all personal property should be abolished. Alexander Volodin actually called Moses Hess a 'philosopher' in his book 'Herzen' (Tallinn, 1972, p. What were his remarkable ideas then?

In his writings, Moses Hess stressed the need to agitate the social classes against each other and in this way hinder their co-operation. He wanted to bring about a socialist revolution with the help of Judaism, racism and the class struggle. He stressed that Socialism was inseparably bound to internationalism, as the socialists have no fatherland. The true socialist cannot have anything to do with his nationality. He also declared: this does not apply to Jews!

Hess believed that internationalism served the interests of Judaism. 'Whoever denies Jewish nationalism is not only an apostate, a renegade in the religious sense, but also a traitor to his people and to his family.' (Moses Hess, 'Selected Works', Cologne, 1962.) The Bolshevik Rosa Luxemburg was also simultaneously an internationalist and a great Jewish patriot - she even ate exclusively kosher food. In his 'Red Catechism for the German People', Moses Hess revealed: 'The socialist revolution is my religion.' He thought it suitable that this brutal struggle for socialist power should be waged under the red family banner of the Rothschilds. Moses Hess wrote to the Jewish socialist leader Ferdinand Lasalle: 'I use the sword against anyone who opposes the struggle of the proletariat.' (Moses Hess, 'Correspondence', The Hague, 1959).

What he actually meant was the struggle of the Judaists. The radical agitator Hess was not an atheist, however. He wrote: 'I have always been edified by Hebrew prayers.' (Moses Hess, 'Rome and Jerusalem', 1860.) Hess also explained that Judaism was to pass into a godless socialist, revolutionary ideology. He stressed that the Jews had been given the role of changing mankind into a savage animal, as described in his article 'About the Monetary System'. ('Rheinische Jahrbucher', Vol. 1, 1845.) Later, Marx and Engels stated quite openly that many of Hess' ideas deserved a wide recognition.

The Hungarian Jew Theodor Herzl further developed Hess' Zionist doctrine in the 1890s. Another of Marx's guides, Levi Baruch, emphasised to him that the revolutionary elite of Jews were not to reject Judaism and that they should be called traitors to their own people if they did so. As sham Christians, some Jews had reached the highest positions in the Church and civil town administration in Spain in the 16th century (the Inquisitor Lucero and many others). Baruch propagated the same tactics for 'revolutionary Jews' - they were to hide their Judaism behind Marxist phrases.

When one of Baruch's letters to Marx was published, its contents caused a big scandal, which they wanted to silence at once. This letter explained, among other things, that it would be easy for Jewry to get into power with the help of the proletariat. Thus the new governments were to be led by Jews who would forbid all private property so that all these riches came into Jewish hands, or made the Jews administrators of the fortunes and estates.

In this way an old dream which the Talmud speaks of, namely that all the riches of the world would come into the hands of the Jews, was to be fulfilled. In his letter, Baruch also made it clear that the goals of Judaism were power over the whole world, a mingling of the races, abolition of national frontiers, elimination of the royal families and finally the founding of the Zionist world state. (Salluste, 'Les origines secretes du bolchevisme', Paris, 1930, pp.

33-34.) The Background of Marx's View of Humanity According to Professor Jan Bergman in Sweden, the Cabbalists regard all non-Jews as cattle. The Talmud also states this opinion in several places. 'The Jewish religion is not a religion at all, it is a calamity.' Israel Shahak also believes Cabbalistic mysticism to be deeply misanthropic.

('Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years', London, 1994, pp. 16-19.) In Deuteronomy 20:10-17 we are informed that all other nations must work for the Jews if they come into the Jews' dominion. If they resist, they must be killed and their property robbed. All goyim must be exterminated where the Jews already live. In Deuteronomy 7:16 (King James' Bible), one can read the following.

'And thou shalt consume all the people that the LORD thy god shall deliver thee; thine eye shall have no pity upon them.' The Jews have unfortunately followed these incitements to genocide from time to time. The Greek historian Dio Cassius (who was also a Roman official) described in detail how the Jews in the eastern provinces of the Roman Empire, in the year 116 A.D., during a rebellion began to murder various races they lived among. Judaists killed both women and children, at times using terrible torture.

The most infamous bloodbaths were committed in the city of Cyrene and the province Cyrenaica (in the eastern part of present-day Libya) and on Cyprus and above all in its capital Salamis. The Greek historian Eusebius confirmed this. Mass murders were also perpetrated in Mesopotamia and Palestine. In Cyrenaica alone, the Jews killed 220,000 Romans and Greeks. On in Cyprus, their victims were estimated at 240,000. On this island the Jew Artemion led the murders. Understandably, the Jews were no longer welcome on Cyprus after this.

The Roman Emperor Marcus Ulpius Traianus (53-117 A.D.) sent troops to stop the killing. It took Rome a year to rein in the blood-lust of the Jews. Dio Cassius tells us how the Jews even ate their victims and smeared themselves with their blood. (William Douglas Morrison, 'The Jews Under Roman Rule', London and New York, 1890, pp. 191-193.) The most brutal murders were committed in Egypt. Dio Cassius describes how the Jews even attacked the ships in which fear-stricken people tried to escape. (Dr Emil Schurer, 'Geschichte des judischen Volkes im Zeitalter Jesu Christi' / 'History of the Jewish people in the time of Christ', Leipzig, 1890, p.

559.) I shall give some further examples of massacres perpetrated by Judaists. 517, Judaists headed by Joseph (Jussuf) Mashrak Dhu Nuwas seized power in the north of Himyar in southern Arabia (now Saudi Arabia) and at once began to destroy the Christians and other Gentiles in the area.

This wild slaughter shook all of Europe. Dhu Nuwas had seized power by force and introduced Judaism as the new national religion. Allied troops from Byzantium, Arabia and Aksum (Ethiopia) managed to overthrow Dhu Nuwas in May, A.D. The mass murderer was executed. Kobistyanov, A. Mirimanov, 'The Meeting of Civilisations in Africa', Tallinn, 1973, pp.

84-85.) But those were not crimes according to the Jews because, as the Talmud tells us: 'Even the best of the goyim must be killed.' The Jews have themselves written of their massacres in the Bible. In Esther 9:16, we find the story of how the Jews, with Mordocai at their head, murdered 75,000 Persians and members of other nations. The Judaists celebrate this genocide every year in February or March as the feast of Purim. Against the background of these Cabbalistic beliefs we are able to explain Marx's extreme contempt for other races.

The Russians were a totally inferior people according to him. He called all the Slavic peoples an 'ethnic sewer'. He also disliked the Chinese. (New York Times, 25th of June 1963.) He rejected everyone who was unwilling to participate in his 'revolutionary' struggle against God.

He called the workers, for whom he had created his ideology, idiots and asses. He called the peasants cavemen. Another reason why Bakunin later distanced himself from Marxism was that it was a further development of Judaism. For Yahweh gave the Jews the right to steal the lands of others (Deuteronomy 6:10-13, 6:18-19, 7:1-2). Yahweh gave the Israelites the right to commit genocide, to totally annihilate the peoples whose lands they had the God-given right to take as their own (Deuteronomy 7:16).

Yahweh gave the Israelites the right to 'destroy them (other peoples) with a mighty destruction until they be destroyed' (Deuteronomy 7:23). Yahweh gave the Israelites the right to murder and plunder other races of their property (Exodus 3:20-22). Yahweh has made the Israelites a 'holy' people, a master race among other races (Deuteronomy 7:6). In his book 'God and the State', Bakunin declared. 'Of all the good gods who have ever been worshipped by men, Yahweh is the most jealous, the most vain, the cruellest, the most unjust, the blood-thirstiest, the most despotic and the one who is most hostile against human dignity and liberty.' Incredible Admissions by Marx, Disraeli and Others To maintain the illusion that Judaism had nothing to do with Marxism and that the Mosaic religion actually posed an ideological threat to Marxist Communism, several Communist leaders (among others Marx himself, Pierre Joseph Proudhon, Francois Marie Charles Fournier - all Jews) made some so-called critical statements about Jews. Communist leaders (among others Marx himself, Pierre Joseph Proudhon, Francois Marie Charles Fournier - all Jews) Several more recent Communist leaders have also made sure that they were accused of anti-Semitism to divert suspicions from the Frankist-Cabbalist aspect of Communism.

Most so-called Sovietologists and researchers (who have no personal experience of Communism) have allowed themselves to be fooled by this pantomime. Even Tommy Hansson, whose sympathies lie with the bourgeoisie, spreads this myth further in his book 'Marxismens ideologi' / 'The Ideology of Marxism' (Stockholm, 1989). In 1844 Marx wrote in his article 'On the Jewish Question', that the Jews more or less controlled Europe, that their worldly god was money and that their most important business was to swindle money from people by means of extortionate interest rates. Marx reasoned. 'Which is the deepest foundation of the Jewish religion? The practical needs, egoism. What is abstract in the Jewish religion?

Contempt for theory, art, history, for man as a goal in himself - this has become the money-loving man's true conscious position and virtue. As soon as society has managed to rid itself of the empirical nature of Judaism, bartering and its conditions, the Jew will become unimaginable, because then his conscious-ness no longer has an object.' He also firmly asserted. 'Behind every tyrant there is always a Jew.' Marx admitted that the Christian society was being Judaised, so becoming ever more capitalistic and increasingly worshipping money. Every intelligent person knew this.

How the Jews took over commerce in Polish Galicia in the 19th century was no secret. Polish businesses were ruined by the amalgamation of Jewish merchants.

The competing Jewish businessmen suddenly began to sell their merchandise at much lower prices than the Poles, so that their businesses eventually went bankrupt. Then the Jewish businessmen raised their prices, thereby gaining control over the entire market in Galicia. Centuries before, the Roman writer Tacitus (54-119 A.D.) stated.

'God's name is not profaned if a Jew lies to a Goy.' (Baba Kamma 113b.) In the middle of the Crimean war, on the 4th of January 1856, Marx arrogantly revealed to the New York Daily Tribune that there was an organization, which was intriguing in Europe and was the real winner when England, France and Russia became weakened after losses in wars. Other Jews have also been just as open.

In his novel 'Coningsby', Benjamin Disraeli described how a secret Jewish organization ruled the world by means of banks. He showed how easy it was for this organization to destroy empires and establish others, to overthrow rulers and install new ones in their stead. Disraeli, whose father had immigrated to England from Italy, was well-versed in the secrets of the Frankists and wrote that Germany faces a terrible revolution, which is being prepared with the help of the Jews; at the head of the communists and socialists stand Jews. The purpose was to neutralise the Christians and transform the world into a Jewish world with values built on violence, the basic idea being that problems can only be solved by the use of force.

Disraeli stated: 'We create our luck and call it fate.' It was Disraeli who first officially used the term 'big brother' (a Masonic term) about a dictator. George Orwell made the idea widely known in his book '1984'. Disraeli was, as is commonly known, the prime minister of Great Britain in 1868 and in 1874-80. He was later knighted and became Lord Beaconsfield. Wasn't it strange that Marx was later accused of anti-Semitism but not Disraeli, who described the same phenomenon? Or did it have something to do with the fact that Marx openly became a communist but not Disraeli, who was a conservative?

Neither has one of the great English authors, the autodidact Herbert George Wells (1866-1946), been accused of anti-Semitism. In 1939, he published a book with the title 'The Fate of Homo Sapiens', where he wrote the following concerning the orthodox Jews. 'The whole question turns upon the Chosen People idea, which this remnant cherishes and sustains, which it is the 'mission' of this remnant to cherish and sustain. It is difficult not to regard that idea as a conspiracy against the rest of the world.

Almost every community with which the orthodox Jews have come into contact has sooner or later developed and acted upon that conspiracy idea. A careful reading of the Bible does nothing to correct it; there indeed you have the conspiracy plain and clear. It is not simply the defensive conspiracy of a nice harmless people anxious to keep up their dear, quaint old customs, that we are dealing with. It is an aggressive and vindictive conspiracy.'

The Jewish philosopher Erich Fromm also admitted that the revolutionaries were really criminals. Marx and Engels as Illuminati There are not many today who know that Moses Hess was connected to the Illuminati. It was he who introduced both Marx and Engels to the Illuminati. On 5 July 1843, at the lodge Le Socialiste in Brussels, the Masonic leader Ragon submitted the draft for the revolutionary plan of action, which was later made into 'The Communist Manifesto'. The lodge Le Socialiste sent the proposal to their and Belgium's largest Masonic authority, Supreme Conseil de Belgique, and they unanimously decided to accept Ragon's anarchist program as 'corresponding to the Masonic, doctrine concerning the social question and that the world which is united in Grand Orient should with all conceivable means aim to realise it'. (Bulletin du Grand Orient, June 1843.) On 17 November 1845, Karl Marx became a member of the lodge Le Socialiste. In February 1848, Marx published his 'Communist Manifesto' on the orders of the Masonic leadership.

Marx and Engels were freemasons of the 31st degree. (Vladimir Istarkhov, 'The Battle of the Russian Gods', Moscow, 2000, p. 154.) In 1847, Marx and Engels became members of The League of Just Men, one of the Illuminati's underground branches where the Jew Jakob Venedey played an important role.

This secret organization was founded in 1836 in Paris by 'revolutionary' Jewish socialists. On the 12th of May 1839, The League of Just Men, together with another conspiratorial group The Seasons, attempted to seize power in France under the leadership of the Jewish freemasons Joseph Moll, Karl Christian Schapper and the founder of the organization, the freemason Louis Auguste Blanqui. The attempt failed and Blanqui was imprisoned.

The leaders escaped to London, where The League of Just Men became an international subversive organization headed by Joseph Moll and Karl Schapper. Similar coup attempts in Poland and France in 1831 also failed. The financial elite and the Illuminati needed a suitable ideology to camouflage their aspiration to power. They wanted to carry out certain conspiratorial plans and at the same time propagate for atheism. The workers happened to be 'useful idiots' and could be made excellent blind tools, which they hoped to be able to manipulate most efficiently. To carry on with their conspiracy in the name of the working classes, they had to cultivate and shape all kinds of communist and socialist Utopias. Hess and Marx hoped to exploit the jealousy of the stupid proletariat to enforce a hell on earth where fear, suffering, terror and treason ruled supreme - Communism.

This is why Moses Hess suggested transforming The League of Just Men into a communist party in November 1847. Together with Engels, Marx reorganised (Soviet term) the League before the end of the year. Moses Hess, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Wilhelm Weitling, Hermann Kriege, Joseph Weydemeyer, Ernst and Ferdinand Wolf played important roles. Marx was commissioned to write the manifesto of the Communist Party, according to the Soviet-Estonian Encyclopedia.

It was Moses Hess who made him work out the religion of the socialist revolution. Marx did this with the co-operation of the slave-trader Jean Lafitte-Laflinne. 'The Communist Manifesto' was published in London. In this document, Marx had only further developed the ideas of the Illuminist leaders Adam Weishaupt and Clinton Roosevelt. He had at the same time used the conspiratorial experience of the Utopian communist and Illuminatus Francois Noel Babeuf (1760-1797) to show the way to the socialist (Illuminist) revolution. In this way, Communism and Socialism became the code names for the Illuminati's program, which was to extinguish all moral principles, whereupon everything was allowed.

After this, the Illuminati did everything to spread the new religion, whose prophet and apostle was to be Karl Marx, who wrote: 'A spectre is haunting Europe - the spectre of Communism.' ('The Communist Manifesto'.) Against the competing religions, Marx raised the slogan 'Religion is the opium of the people!' He began to wildly propagate the idea that the old society could only be ended by 'a single method - with revolutionary terrorism'.

(Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, 'Works', Moscow, Volume 5, p. 494.) In 'The Communist Manifesto', Marx and Engels openly declared that force must be used to conquer the world: 'The ruling classes shall tremble before the coming Communist Revolution!'

'We can only reach our goals by violently overthrowing the entire established order.' In 'Das Kapital' (1867) Marx also believed it absolutely necessary to stress the need of violence in socialist actions. He wrote: 'Violence is the midwife who helps a new society struggle out from the womb of the old.'

Slogans like 'Workers of the world - unite!' Were needed in order to get the army of the blind to aid the Illuminati into power before they were subdued and finally enslaved - all in the name of 'light-bringing' Communism. The class struggle was to abolish many individual liberties and simplify the extinction of all-profound cultural values and creations. Marx eagerly stressed that Socialism was impossible without revolution. Naturally, these Marxist 'theories' were full of contradictions. Marx's 'doctrine' only concerned the way physical work creates values.

In contrast, he did not acknowledge creative thought, which could be said to shape the world to an even greater extent. In this way, he demonstrated to anyone with any insight that his theories were only intended to bait the workers and impudently exploit their intellectual immaturity. The intelligent and gifted people who would not be taken in were bound to perish.

He exhorted the revolutionaries to be neither generous nor honest and definitely not to shy away from the prospect of civil war. Engels, 'Works', Moscow, Volume 33, p. 772.) The result was that the Marxists established a new and complete form of propaganda by preaching fair lies to primitive and dissatisfied people. Marx recommended the industrialisation of society so that the masses would find employment.

In this way they could be recruited as workers. Whether the products of industry were needed or not was unimportant to the Illuminati, neither did it matter whether the production process harmed the environment. If people were left unemployed and given time to think, the Illuminati's violent regime might be endangered. 1848: 'The Year of Revolution' - The First Wave Only a few months after the founding of the Communist Party, revolutions began to 'break out' in various countries. 1848 became the great year of revolutions. The Rothschild family was in charge of the financial side and the League of Communists of the planning. The Rothschilds had become enormously wealthy in connection with the French Revolution (1789-1799) when empires and kingdoms needed to borrow money in amounts previously unparalleled.

The Rothschilds had Europe's best information system with their own couriers, who always managed to bring them decisive news (e.g. The outcome of the battle of Waterloo) before the rulers got wind of it, according to Derek Wilson, 'The Rothschild Family'. In 1847, Lionel Rothschild had become the first Jewish Member of the British Parliament. The former Prussian officer August Willich was made the leader of the terrorists.

He later became a general for the Union in the American Civil War, where he became infamous for the incredible atrocities he committed. The League of Communists had 400 members by this time, according to the Soviet-Estonian Encyclopedia. Forty-odd Scandinavians also took part. 'Revolutions' were started in half of Europe, mostly by Jewish Illuminati or by their henchmen. It all began when an invisible hand utilised the occasion of the poor crop harvest in 1846. Grain was suddenly bought up in large amounts.

During the years 1847-1848, the prices were doubled and tripled as foodstuffs were sent out from secret storehouses. People starved and eventually the time was ripe for bloody revolts. The buyer of all the grain was the Jewish businessman Ephrasi who acted as a front for James Rothschild. A Masonic conference was organised in Strasbourg, Alsace, in May of 1847, where the decision was made to stage the revolution in the spring of 1848. 'The union which we shall create will not be a French, English, Irish or German, but a Jewish World Union.

Under no circumstances shall a Jew befriend a Christian or a Muslim; not before the moment comes when Judaism, the only true religion, shines over the entire World.' Cremieux (33°) also worked closely with the powerful English Jew Chaim Montefiore (1784-1885). Together they saved two Jewish ritual murderers who had admitted to their crimes in Damascus. Sicily came first. On the 12th of January 1848, the 'revolutionaries' in Palermo simply declared Sicily independent.

On the 8th of February the revolutionary movement was organised in Piedmont. The revolt began in Tuscany on the 17th of February. Everything was co-ordinated by two Jewish Illuminati leaders, Giuseppe Mazzini and Adriano Lemmi. Lemmi was a skillful revolutionary conspirator who became a Grand Master of the Grande Oriente d'ltalia in 1885. The freemason and Grand Master Giuseppe Garibaldi (33°) also took part in the planning. Afterwards, they began to act in France. A revolt was stirred up in Paris on the 22nd-23rd of February.

Isaac Cremieux made sure that Louis Philippe was dethroned and he fled to London on the 24th of February. Lamartine seized power. On the very same day, the 24th February, 'The Communist Manifesto' was published. Riots also occurred elsewhere. March 1848 - The Prepared Plan. The freemason and Illuminati leader Giuseppe Mazzini (1805-1872) If we take a closer look at the points in time when 'revolutions' broke out in several places in March of 1848, we see a clear connection, which reveals a prepared plan behind the events. On the 5th of March, the so-called pre-Parliament held a meeting in Heidelberg, led by the Grand Master of the local Masonic lodge and attended mainly by Jews who also took part in the Illuminati conference in Strasbourg.

On March 11th, the Illuminati founded the Council of Saint Wenceslas - Vaclav - in Prague. The violent incidents in this series of events began on March 13th with the rebellion in the Austrian capital, Vienna. The architects behind the action were two Jewish doctors, Adolf Fischhof and Joseph Goldmark.

On March 14th a 'revolution' occurred in Rome. The leader here was Giuseppe Mazzini, who declared the Papal States a republic. This republic was later crushed, despite Garibaldi's stubborn defence. A revolt in Hungarian Pest had been planned well in advance for the 15th of March. The leaders of the Hungarian revolt were the Jew Mahmud Pascha (Freund), who organised the coup in Budapest, and the freemason Lajos Kossuth, who acted in the provinces. The intention was to celebrate the murder of the Roman Emperor Gaius Julius Caesar on the same day in 44 B.C. The Masonic lodge, the Grand Orient still praises Brutus for this murder.

Riots in Naples and Paris had been planned for the same day. The 18th of March became a special day. Then the dark powers agitated for rebellions in Milan and Stockholm and for a revolution in Berlin.

The revolution in Berlin was led exclusively by Jewish freemasons. The actions on this Saturday were even planned to take place at the same time in Milan, Berlin and Stockholm.

The 18th of March was an important day for the Jewish freemasons. The Jewish Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay, had been burned at the stake in Paris on this same day in 1314. These revolts were intended as a revenge both for his execution and for the abolition of the Knights Templar two years earlier, all of which was done by the orders of Philip the Fair (1268-1314). These plans of revenge involved the murder of the Prussian King Wilhelm IV (1795-1861) in Berlin, following which the Illuminatus Mikhail Bakunin was to become the dictator of Prussia. But the plans were foiled when a faithful subject warned his king. He was, however, forced to capitulate and make great concessions.

Johann Jacoby led the revolt. These plans of revenge were put into action again 23 years later - on the 18th of March 1871 - when the Paris commune was proclaimed.

Later, in the Soviet Union, this day was celebrated as the day of the Red Aid. The troubles reached Stockholm too, far faster than a galloping horse (the fastest means of communication at that time). Those riots were the bloodiest, most violent events in the history of the city.

Bunny Ragnerstam states in his book 'Arbetare i rorelse' / 'Workers in Action' (Stockholm, 1986) that 18 people were killed during the troubles. The instigators were the Communist Association in Stockholm, founded in the autumn of 1847. This organization had connections with the European Communist League. The power behind the operation was the Jewish writer Christoffer Kahnberg, who also wrote the proclamations, which were posted all over the city. 'Destroy the nobility and give the bourgeois and the workers their rights!' 'The hour of revolution has struck!'

'Down with the government!' (At this time, Sweden had a liberal king, Oscar I.) 'Long live liberty, equality, fraternity!' 'Long live the people! Long live the Republic!' On March 17th, the revolt against the Austrians in Venice was organised.

On the same day, the 'revolutionaries' freed Daniele Manin (1804-1857), a Jewish freemason and Giuseppe Mazzini's agent. On the 18th of March, he led the attempt to take over power. After defeating the Austrians on the 22nd of March, Manin proclaimed Venice a republic, the leadership of which consisted of freemasons, among whom were two Jewish 'revolutionaries': Leon Pincherle and Isaac Pesaro Maurogonato. The fact that these two were Jews is verified in the Encyclopedia Judaica. According to Mazzini's program (1848), Austria-Hungary had to cease to exist as a state.

The European revolution was therefore to begin in Italy, eventually to lead to the forming of the United States of Europe. The lawyer Daniele Manin, who came from the well-known Jewish Medina family, was named 'president' (dictator in fact) of the Republic of Venice in August 1848. The Austrians eventually managed to crush this republic on the 22nd of August 1849 and Manin fled together with other Jewish Illuminist and Masonic conspirators to Paris, where he stayed for the rest of his life. Judisches Lexikon (Berlin, 1929, Vol.

1363) also confirms that Daniele Manin was a Jew. During the March revolution in Munich, the freemasons forced the Bavarian King Ludwig I to abdicate. On the 21st of March, the 'revolution' began in Schleswig after the Danes had marched in. In our history books, those actions were supposedly 'spontaneous' on the part of the people. The Second Wave, 1848-49.

The patron saint of evil, the freemason - Karl Marx (1818-1883) On the 12th of April, the Jew Friedrich Hecker organised a riot in Baden. On the 15th of May the freemasons began the second rebellion in Vienna, after which they forced the emperor to abdicate.

The 'revolution' in Bohemia (now Czechia) culminated with the rebellion in Prague on the 12th of June 1848. This was put down almost immediately, on June 17th. According to the Soviet-Estonian Encyclopedia, this action was organised in Prague by the Illuminatus Mikhail Bakunin, as was the 'revolt' in Dresden on the 3rd of May 1849, which was also quickly dealt with, after which Bakunin fled from the city on May 9th. He had been a member of the temporary revolutionary government in Dresden. He was later sentenced to death and extradited to Russia. In 1861, he escaped from Siberia to Japan and eventually came back to Europe. On the 22nd of June 1848, a new riot was instigated in Paris.

On the 18th of September, the rebellion in Frankfurt was organised. On the 6th of October, a third attempt at 'revolution' was made in Vienna. Adolf Fischhof took the post of chief of the security committee. He became a real dictator of Austria. The 'revolution' there was fortunately crushed on the 31 st of October. On the 5th of November, the rebellion began anew in Rome. All of this was repeated in many places around Europe.

In Italy, the revolutionary republic was liquidated in the autumn of 1849. A people's militia was also organised during this wave of revolutions. Behind those actions around Europe (in Austria, Italy, France, Hungary, Bohemia, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark and Sweden) in 1848, was a Masonic conspiracy, according to Nesta Webster ('World Revolution', London, 1921, p.

Marx and Engels went to Cologne in April 1848, where they founded a communist newspaper, Neue Rheinische Zeitung, the first issue of which came out on the 1st of June. Its purpose was to spread propaganda.

The founder of the Illuminati, Adam Weishaupt, had declared: 'It is necessary to make our principles modern, then young writers will be able to spread them in society and thereby serve our purpose.' He stressed that the journalists must be influenced so that they harboured no doubts about the Illuminist writers. This was Marx's job.

Eventually the 'revolution' in Germany was completely put down and Marx was exiled in May 1849. Before this, he managed to write in his newspaper. 'When the secret societies, in February 1848, surprised Europe, they were themselves surprised by the unexpected opportunity, and so little capable were they of seizing the occasion, that had it not been for the Jews, who of late years unfortunately have been connecting themselves with these unhallowed associations, imbecile as were the governments, the uncalled for outbreak would not have ravaged Europe.' (Benjamin Disraeli, 'Lord George Bentinck: a Political Biography', London, 1882, p.

357.) Also this quote shows how carefully the Illuminati had planned this wave of destruction, which once more came to a head with the terror in Poland in 1863. The Illuminist Terror Continues. The International Working Men's Association was founded in London on the 28th of September 1864 and following this, Hess, Marx, Engels and Bakunin founded the First International which continued the activity of the Communist League. The Communist League had officially ceased to exist on the 17th of November 1852. The Jewish terrorist Karl Cohen, a member of the First International and an associate of Marx, attempted to murder Prime Minister Otto von Bismarck on Unter den Linden in Berlin on May 7th, 1866.

The Marxists also later continued their terrorist actions. Maxim Kowalevski was present when Marx was informed about the failed attempt to murder Kaiser Wilhelm I in 1878, this time also on Unter den Linden. He claimed that Marx became infuriated and hurled anathemas at the terrorist who had failed in his terrorism.

(Paul Johnson, 'The Intellectuals', Stockholm, 1989, p. 93.) On March 18th, 1871, the Marxists succeeded in introducing the world's first 'Dictatorship of the Proletariat' in Paris. Most of the leading members of 'the revolutionary Paris Commune' (the term originates from 1792) were also members of the First International. This commune was the first warning signal to civilisation that the dark Illuminati forces wanted to destroy it. The Communards were mostly freemasons (Louis Charles Delescluze, Gustave Fluorens, Edouard Vaillant), who also actively fought against Christianity. The Paris Commune was successfully liquidated 71 days later - on the 28th of May 1871.

The terror of the evil Jacobins and Blankists claimed 20,000 human lives. After all, Weishaupt had explained to his disciples: 'You must stifle anyone you cannot persuade!' This setback did not stop the Illuminati. In 1872, Karl Marx decided to shut down the International in Europe; the organization was breaking up under the strain of the power struggle between himself and the leader of the anarchists, Mikhail Bakunin. Four years later, on the 15th of July 1876 (100 years after the creation of the Illuminati Order), the International also ceased in Philadelphia, U.S.A.

The First International, which worked for the Illuminati, engaged Eugene Pottier (1816-1887) to write an anthem for the 'workers' struggle'. This gruesome song became the national 'anthem' of the Soviet Union in 1917 and remained so until 1944, when it became the hymn of the Communist Party. Eugene Pottier was later one of the leaders of the Paris Commune.

From 1890, the 1st of May, the date when the Illuminati were founded, is also the date when communists and socialists across the world celebrate under Rothschild's red flag, which symbolises the permanent revolution, according to Moses Hess. Naturally, it was desirable to find a more 'proletarian' reason to celebrate the founding day. This was why a provocation was arranged in Chicago in 1886, for the Illuminati's 110th birthday. It was hoped that a serious conflict with the police would take place so that there would be a few martyrs whose memory they could celebrate. The attempt failed, however.

Only on the 3rd of May did the police open fire on a group of workers attacking some strike-breakers. One worker was killed immediately and another three died later in hospital. They had their martyrs, but it was on the wrong day!

The instigator was a Jewish Illuminatus and millionaire, Samuel Gompers, who had immigrated from England and become the chairman of the Federation of Trade Unions. Gompers propagated Marx's ideas. (Aftonbladet, 26th June 1986.) At a workers' demonstration on the 4th of May 1886, an Illuminist provocateur threw a bomb at the police present at the meeting. Five policemen were killed. The police opened fire at the demonstrators, of which a few were killed and many wounded.

The Second International in Paris similarly decided to make May 1st a red-letter day in 1889. The real reason for this decision was obviously one that was better hidden from the masses of non-Illuminati. According to the British historian Nesta H. Webster, the Illuminati also had full control of the activities of the Second International (1889-1899). Karl Marx died in exile in London on the 14th of March 1883. All sorts of fair myths were created around his name. In this way he became the patron saint of evil.

After the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe, it has often been claimed that not all the evils, which came with Marxism, were intentional. This was certainly the way Marx had intended his 'teachings' to work. The Illuminati Marx and Engels were successful enough to fool entire nations and their demoniac manifesto was to become a cruel reality for millions of unfortunate people. The Truth behind the Myths There are many myths about Marx: that he was poor and supported only by Engels, that he was against terrorism, very tolerant, and had no wish to destroy the ideas of others.

What was he really like? According to the most famous myth, Marx had no money and was economically dependent on his 'friend' Engels. In reality, Nathan Rothschild financed him.

This was revealed by his close associate Mikhail Bakunin in his 'Polemique contre les Juifs' ('Polemic Against the Jews'). Bakunin broke away from Marx and his companions, because 'they had one foot in the bank and the other foot in the socialist movement'. The Frankist Illuminati's central slogan was: 'No wall is so high that a donkey loaded with gold cannot get over it.' Later, Engels characterised Marx as a monster who was livid with hatred 'as if ten thousand devils had caught him by the hair'. Marx's uncontrolled drinking and his wild, expensive orgies only increased his fury at his environment. All the meetings in Paris had to be held behind closed doors and windows, so that Marx's roaring was not heard out in the street.

Karl Marx had a great craving for the finest foods, and French wine, among other things, was imported for his family's meals. His family had a weakness for expensive habits. A famous Jewish socialist, freemason, Illuminatus and comrade of Marx, Giuseppe Mazzini, who had known Marx well, wrote this about him: 'His heart bursts rather with hatred than with love towards men.' Karl Marx was 'a destructive spirit'. (Fritz Joachim Raddatz, 'Karl Marx: Eine Politische Biographie', Hamburg, 1975.) Marx was an unreliable egoist and a lying intriguer who only wished to exploit others, according to his assistant, Karl Heinzen.

(Karl Heinzen, 'Erlebtes', Boston, 1864.) Heinzen also thought that Marx had small, nasty eyes 'which spat flames of evil fire'. He had a habit of warning: 'I will annihilate you!' Marx was not interested in democracy. The editorial staff of Neue Rheinische Zeitung was, according to Engels, organised so that Marx became its dictator. He could not take criticism.

He always became infuriated if anyone tried to criticise him. In 1874, when Dr Ludwig Kugelmann merely hinted that if Marx would organise his life a little better he might finish 'Das Kapital', Marx would have nothing more to do with Kugelmann and slandered him ruthlessly. When Bakunin accused Marx of seeking to completely centralise power, Marx called him a theoretical nobody. Karl Marx condemned exploitation of people. He himself exploited everyone near him. He fought all those he could not subdue. Even as a child, he had been a real tyrant.

To work was what Marx wanted least of all. He speculated heavily on the stock market, however, constantly losing huge amounts of money. Neither did he show any consideration for the work of others.

Many craftsmen he hired had to wait a long time for their pay. His housekeeper, Helen Demuth, worked like a slave in his household for 40 years without any cash pay whatsoever. It does not seem so strange then, that Marx supported slavery in the United States of America. Like his brother Illuminatus Albert Pike, he vented his racist opinions against blacks.

In further reference to Marx's housekeeper Helen Demuth, it can be said that on June 23, 1851, she gave birth to a baby boy whose father's name was Karl Marx. The father wanted to know nothing about Henry Frederick Demuth, however, so the boy was given up to a foster-home. The case of the disowned son later became an embarrassment for the Bolshevik leaders in Moscow, so Joseph Stalin classified as secret those letters between Marx and Engels, where this affair is too apparent. (Viikkolehti, 11th of January 1992.) Marx collected information about his political rivals and opponents. He delivered the notes he made to the police, believing it to be of advantage to him.

Paul Johnson states this. Marx preached about a better society but did not care about any morals.

Neither did he care about cleanliness. This had a bad effect on both his health and his contacts with other revolutionaries. He suffered from boils for 25 years. In 1873 these boils caused him a nervous breakdown leading to tremors and violent fits of rage. He never ate fruit or vegetables.

Marx as a Publicist As a publicist, Marx 'borrowed' all of his slogans. It was Jean-Paul Marat who formulated the phrases 'Workers have no fatherland!' And 'The proletariat have nothing to lose but their chains!' He took the slogan 'Religion is the opium of the people!' From the Jewish writer Heinrich Heine. Karl Schapper originally came up with 'Workers of the world, unite!' Neither was the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' one of Marx's ideas - Louis Blanqui was author of it.

In 1841, the Jewish Illuminatus Clinton Roosevelt published his book 'The Science of Government, Founded on Natural Law', in which he based his doctrines on Weishaupt's teachings. Six years later, Marx used Roosevelt's principles to write his Communist Manifesto. In this cunning work, he made propaganda for these Illuminist plans: the abolishment of private property, family, nationalism and patriotism, the right of inheritance, religion and all morals.

Marx and Engels state indirectly that a world government must be introduced for the sake of the workers. The holy book of the socialists, 'Das Kapital', published on September 2, 1867, is especially revealing since this work shows not only that the author was a careless and incompetent theorist, but also that he was a downright liar. Paul Johnson demonstrates this in his book 'The Intellectuals'. In 1867, 'Das Kapital' sold only 200 copies in all Germany. Thus Marx wrote about the situation of the weavers in Silesia without having spoken to any of them. He wrote about industry without having visited a single factory in his life. Marx even refused Engels' offer to visit a cotton factory.

Marx met some workers for the first time in 1845 in London and at the German Workers' Educational Association. These were mostly cultivated, self-taught workers and craftsmen who disliked Marx's violent opinions. They would have preferred to see their situation improved gradually by way of reforms and social development. Marx felt contempt for them and wanted the intellectuals of the middle classes as support for his apocalyptic ideas about the destruction of capitalist society. Marx later did all in his power to keep socialist workers out of influential positions in the International. For the sake of appearances only, a few were allowed to remain on various committees.

Marx's most violent conflict occurred when he met the labour leader William Weitling in 1846. Marx accused Weitling of having no doctrine. According to Marx, one could not act in the best interests of the workers without a doctrine. Only the first part of 'Das Kapital' was written by Marx.

Engels wrote the rest under instructions from Marx. Only the eighth chapter of part one, 'The Working Day', deals with the situation of the workers. 'Das Kapital' is in no way a scientific analysis, since Marx presented only facts, that supported his theories. The material was not only a biased selection, it had also been falsified and distorted to suit Marx's opinions. He used only one single source to claim his theory, Engels' 'Die Lage der arbeitenden Klassen in England' / 'The Condition of the Working Class in England', published in Leipzig in 1845. Engels, the son of a cotton producer, knew only about the German textile industry and nothing of note about this industry in other countries. His knowledge of the situation of miners and agricultural labourers was negligible, yet he wrote about the mining and agricultural proletariat.

Two careful researchers, William O. Henderson and William H. Chaloner, made a new translation of Engels' book in 1958, editing it and checking his sources and the original texts for all his quotations.

Their analysis virtually annihilated the objective historical value of the work and showed it for what it really was: political propaganda. Engels made a selection suitable for his work from obsolete facts from the years 1801-1818, never indicating that this was the case. There were also falsifications and misquotations amounting to a total of 23 pages (over 5 per cent of the book's 354 pages).

Henderson and Chaloner demonstrated with their analysis that Engels had not been honest in his researching. So Marx used a work of that calibre as the only source of his statements and conclusions. He was fully aware of the falsifications, since the German economist Bruno Hildebrand had already revealed most of them in 1948, and Marx had been informed of the criticism. Marx used misquotations himself.

He misquoted William Gladstone and the economist Adam Smith. He even misquoted official reports.

The two researchers from Cambridge showed in their examination 'Comments on the Use of the Blue Books by Karl Marx in Chapter XV of 'Das Kapital' (1985), that Marx had not only been careless but had intentionally falsified Paul Johnson came to the same conclusion: that one must be sceptical about all of Marx's texts and that one could never rely on his assertions. For example, Marx claimed that railway accidents had become more frequent whereas the case was exactly the opposite.

The Moral Bankruptcy of Marxism According to blind Marxists, of whom there are plenty in Sweden, Marx stood for humanism and human values, liberty and belief in mankind. They probably have not read the following lines about Marx by Friedrich Engels: 'Who is chasing with wild endeavour? A black man from Trier, a remarkable monster. He does not walk or run, he jumps on his heels and rages full of anger.' (Marx and Engels, 'Selected Works' in German, supplementary tome II, p.

301.) The exiled Estonian non-socialist writer Arvo Magi stated in a radio programme that Marx was not a terrorist who wished to destroy the ideas of others. Marx tolerated no ideas but the Illuminist ones which were later known as Marxist. Marxism merely gave the dark Illuminist powers a hypocritical method and a verbose phraseology, which they could use to justify any kind of enormity they committed.

Since this doctrine was unscientific, they would never in all their attempts be able to put the Marxist theories into practice. What the Marxist regimes really wanted was to treat their subjects with such violence that they eventually lost all feelings of mercy and humanity towards their fellows. The Marxists also took all the proceeds of workers' produce by paying them too little or nothing at all for their work.

In this way the Marxists developed modern slavery. Shall we ever be able to understand the extent of crimes of the Marxists against the natural order? Everywhere, where these bandits have come into power, it has led to the advance of state criminalism and gangsterism. It would be futile to hope for anything else.

Those dictators forced their slaves to act against nature, and the slaves answered with lies, theft, cruelty, hypocrisy and laziness. Certain judges of Marxism try to claim that those who can interpret the doctrine correctly have not yet reached power. How is it that only Marxists who interpreted the doctrine wrongly came into power? And what kind of hell can we expect when the 'true interpreters' of this doctrine eventually reach power? Marxism became what it had to become. Nothing else could be expected from such a brutal, primitive doctrine, which leads straight into the arms of demonic forces.

According to Buddhism, what matters is the good path, not the good goal. What you do is of importance, not what you say. If you walk the evil path, as do the Illuminati, you will never reach the good goal. If you walk the good path, you will finally reach the good goal.

This is why there is no such thing as good violence. You cannot build anything on evil. It is like building upon the sand. Those who try are deceiving themselves.

Neither is it possible to reform an absurd religion, a truth emphasised by the Italian philosopher Filippo Giordano Bruno four hundred years ago. I believe that an attempt to do so is an unpardonable crime.

Fanatical Marxists believed that something could be built on an ideology composed entirely of lies. It is just as impossible to have the state control all that happens within a society. Most of those who later became subjects of the Marxist states also knew that the introduction of Marx's ism was a terrible crime against humanity. Few people know, however, how all this happened and why. For, as the former President of Columbia University in New York, Nicolas Butler, pointed out.

'The world consists of three types of people. First, the smallest group - those who put plans into action. Then the second, slightly larger group, who see what is happening. Last, the great majority who never knew what happened.'

After the collapse of the Marxist regimes in Eastern Europe, some startling facts about the hidden history of Communism have been unearthed. Download Game Bruce Lee Dragon Warrior Cho Android on this page. Most of these facts have never been presented to the Western European or American public. There is simply no wish in Europe or America to throw out the remaining myths about Marxism. In some countries, however, the epoch of Marxist lies has come to an end.

Professor Albert Meinhold at the University of Jena (formerly in East Germany) symbolically threw out a sculpture of Marx from one of the corridors of the university. In justifying his action, Meinhold said that, although Marx had been conferred the degree of Doctor of Law at the university (in his absence), a large part of humanity had suffered from such terrible evils in the name of Marx and Marxism that his memory was therefore nothing to honour (Svenska Dagbladet, January 28, 1992). Marx was, in other words, thrown into the dustbin! The eye of the all engulfing snake THE UNKNOWN VLADIMIR ULYANOV We have all been led to believe that Vladimir Ulyanov was born in Simbirsk on the 22nd of April 1870.

According to the latest enquiries, however, his date of birth had been changed to that date. (Akim Arutiunov, 'The phenomenon Vladimir Ulyanov/Lenin', Moscow, 1992, p. 126.) An investigation is currently under way to find out when the man was really born. Stalin copied his great teacher and, like him, changed his date of birth.

Officially, he was born on the 21st of December 1879, but he was actually born on the 6th of December 1878. The newspaper Izvestiya revealed this state secret on the 26th of June 1990. Both Lenin and Stalin wished to prevent their true natures being revealed by the aid of horoscopes.

Napoleon also falsified his date of birth for astrological reasons. It was not suitable for a French emperor to be an Aquarian, so he changed the date to the 15th of August (1769), in order to officially become a Leo. It is generally known that Lenin's official biography has been falsified throughout. Despite this, a decision was made to publish a still more effective version of the myth. So the libraries were purged of all the Lenin biographies printed before 1970. Who was Vladimir Ulyanov-Lenin really? The history of Russia is written by its murderers, a fact which the director Stanislav Govorukhin stresses in his documentary 'The Russia We Lost' (1992).

A heavily censored version of this film was shown in Sweden. Lenin's Kalmuck father, Ilya Ulyanov, was a school inspector. Both of his grandfathers ended up in mental institutions. Lenin's mother Maria (maiden name Blank) was of a noble family and daughter of a rich landowner. Maria Blank's father, Israel, was born in 1802 in Starokonstantinovo in the province of Volynia. In 1820 Israel Blank planned to study at the Medical Academy of St.

Petersburg together with his brother Abel, but state universities were closed to Jews so both Israel and Abel were baptised into the Russian Orthodox Church. Israel was given the new name of Alexander, his brother Abel became Dmitri. Alexander's patronymic also became Dmitri (it was actually Moses). In this way, they were both allowed to enter the Medical Academy. The Blank brothers graduated in 1824. Alexander Blank became a military staff doctor and a pioneer of balneology (the study of healthy baths) in Russia. The writer Marietta Shaginyan, who in the 1930s learned about Lenin's Jewish roots, was warned not to make this information public, for it was a state secret.

(The periodical Literator, No. 38, 12th of September 1990, St. Petersburg.) It was possible to publish these facts only in 1990.

Until then the Blank family had been presented as 'Germans'. Lenin's mother spoke Yiddish, German and also Swedish, the latter of which she taught her daughter Olga, who intended to study at the University of Helsinki. Maria Blank's maternal grandmother was called Anna Beata Ostedt, born in St. Petersburg in a family of goldsmiths who had immigrated from Uppsala (Sweden). Maria Blank's maternal grandfather, the notary Johann-Gottlieb Grosschopf, came from a family of merchants in Germany. Maria Blank's paternal grandparents were Jews.

Lenin's paternal grandfather was a Chuvashian and his paternal grandmother, Anna Smirnova, was a Kalmuck. This made Maria Blank at least half Jewish, for only her father was a full Jew. Levy, chairman of the Jewish community of Gothenburg, has declared: 'Everyone who was born of a Jewish mother is a Jew.' (Svenska Dagbladet, 22nd of July, 1990.) Some researchers, however, have intimated that also the Grosschopf family was Jewish. If so, Lenin must be regarded as a Jew, for then his mother was a Jewess.

In Russia, it was revealed that Lenin's paternal grandfather Nikolai Ulyanov (Kalmuck) had four children with his own daughter Alexandra Ulyanova (who was disguised as Anna Smirnova before the authorities). Lenin's father Ilya was born as the fourth child when Nikolai Ulyanov was 67 years old. (Vladimir Istarkhov, 'The Battle of the Russian Gods', Moscow, 2000, p. 37.) Ilya Ulyanov married the Jewess Maria Blank, whose paternal grandfather Moisya Blank had been prosecuted for several crimes, including fraud and extortion. Inbreeding probably played a big role in making Vladimir Ulyanov-Lenin so perverted: his extreme aggressiveness was hereditary and he was born with substantial brain damage, he had several nervous breakdowns, three strokes and was bisexual. He was also a psychopath.

German was spoken in the family, a language Vladimir Ulyanov knew better than Russian. In every questionnaire, Lenin wrote that he was a writer, yet his Russian vocabulary was very limited and in his pronunciation he stressed words inaccurately.

He had very little knowledge of Russian literature, but enough to harbour an intense dislike of Fiodor Dostoyevsky's works. It was characteristic of Lenin that he gave different information about the year of his entrance into the Party in different Party documents. In the first questionnaires, he claimed to have joined in 1893, but on the 7th of March 1921, at the Tenth Party Congress, he stated in the delegate's questionnaire that he had become a Party member in 1894. (Akim Arutiunov, 'The Phenomenon Vladimir Ulyanov/Lenin', Moscow, 1992, p. 116.) In one of his writings, comrade Ulyanov claimed to have joined the Party in 1895 ('Collected Works', Vol. How could he be a member of a party, which did not even exist?

The Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party was founded only in March 1898. It seems that anything was possible for Lenin. According to the official myth, Lenin had been expelled from the university, but the special archives of the Central Committee state clearly that Vladimir Ulyanov himself asked the Principal of the University of Kazan for permission to leave his studies in 1887. According to the Bolshevik myth, he was expelled to the village of Kokushkino in the province of Kazan for taking part in student revolutionary activities. Actually, he went to live on his maternal grandfather's estate in Kokushkino after leaving university, an estate which the Tsar had given Alexander Blank.

Lenin's grandfather Blank owned the whole village. Later, Lenin lived with his aunt in Kazan, a fact which Lenin himself has written about. Lenin's grandfather also owned another estate (98 hectares) in the village of Alakayevka near Samara. There is nothing left of the real facts in Lenin's official biography.

This can be ascertained by studying formerly secret documents, which have recently been released. The kind-hearted people fell for the myths about Lenin. Marie Laidoner, the widow of Estonia's former Commander-in-Chief Johan Laidoner, wrote in her memoirs that if Lenin had lived in 1940, the Estonians would not have been treated so inhumanely.

According to the central myth, the terror and oppression were started only in the 1930s by Stalin. This was also claimed by an editorial in the Aftonbladet on the 6th of June 1989.

The Soviet propaganda mythology claimed that his parents consciously educated Lenin to be a Messiah who would lead the proletariat from their captivity in Egypt, as Karl Radek (actually Tobiach Sobelsohn) wrote in Izvestiya in the spring of 1933. Lenin's mother actually wanted him to be a landowner.

The Leninist propaganda had a massive effect on Homo Sovieticus. In an opinion poll in December 1989, 70 per cent of those asked (2700 took part) believed Lenin to be the greatest personality in history. (Paevaleht, January 4, 1991.) Another opinion poll was held in January 1991 where only 10.3 per cent of those asked thought Lenin was a negative person, whilst over half of them believed the October Coup to have been a historical mistake. This is why nothing upsets orthodox communists so much as revelations about Lenin.

They refuse to abandon their icon-like picture of Lenin, since Christianity was replaced with Leninism as early as in the 1920s when the whole doctrine was canonised. In the beginning, the sailors called Lenin 'Little Father'. Lenin used all sorts of tried and tested idiocies. One example: 'Work books' of the kind used with natives in the colonies were used from June 1919.

Lenin had few ideas of his own. Even the idea of the land decree was an inheritance from the left-wing Social Revolutionaries.

Among his own stupidities were the so-called April Theses which do not correspond with reality since economic independence is impossible without political freedom. At least Vladimir Ulyanov understood that Marxism lacked all scientific value. He had whispered to the Jewish businessman Armand Hammer.

'Armand, Armand - Socialism is never going to work!' (Svenska Dagbladet, August 30, 1987.) According to Engels, Marx had transformed Utopian Socialism into a scientific doctrine by 'discovering' the materialist (i.e. Atheist) worldview (this is how Engels is interpreted in the Soviet-Estonian Encyclopedia). As an enlightened Marxist, Lenin knew of Marx's instructions, according to which the revolutionaries were supposed to be neither 'generous' nor 'honest'. There was no need to be fussy about the aims in order to reach their goals. Nor was there any need to worry about the danger of civil war. (Marx and Engels, 'Works', Moscow, Vol.

172.) Adam Weishaupt had written that all means were permissible in order to reach the final goal. Lenin repeated that all means were justifiable when the goal was the victory of Communism. Lenin's goal was to damage Russia and, if possible, gain power and become rich.

He was prepared to work with any forces in order to damage Russia, even with the authorities in Imperial Germany, according to facts that became known later. Lenin was unable to arouse any interest among naive people for the 'revolutionary activities' of a simply Marxist club - most joined as cold-blooded conspirators and adventurers. In 1919 the confidant [confident?] Lenin said in: 'What is Soviet Power?' (contained on one of his phonograph records) that Soviet power was inevitable and was victorious everywhere in the world. 'This power is invincible, since it is the only right one,' Lenin finished in his burring un-Russian accent.

Lenin as a Freemason Whether Lenin was a freemason as early as in the 1890s is not yet possible to determine but he worked in the same way as subversive groups usually do. The Illuminati, the Grand Orient, B'nai B'rith (Sons of the Covenant), and other Masonic lodges were all interested in agitating the workers towards certain 'useful' goals. It is important to stress that Lenin and his henchmen did not work. They could still afford to travel around Europe (then relatively more expensive than now) and live in luxury.

These professional revolutionaries had only one task- to agitate the workers. Lenin's later activity shows clearly how he followed Adam Weishaupt's line. Several sources reveal that Lenin became a freemason whilst abroad (in 1908). One of these sources is a thorough investigation: Nikolai Svitkov's 'About Freemasonry in Russian Exile', published in Paris in 1932.

According to Svitkov, the most important freemasons from Russia were Vladimir Ulyanov-Lenin, Leon Trotsky (Leiba Bronstein), Grigori Zinoviev (Gerson Radomyslsky), Leon Kamenev (actually Leiba Rosenfeld), Karl Radek (Tobiach Sobelsohn), Maxim Litvinov (Meyer Hennokh Wallakh), Yakov Sverdlov (Yankel-Aaron Solomon), L. Martov (Yuli Zederbaum), and Maxim Gorky (Alexei Peshkov), among others. According to the Austrian political scientist Karl Steinhauser's 'EG - die Super-UdSSR von morgen' / 'EU the New Super USSR' (Vienna, 1992, p.

192), Lenin belonged to the Masonic lodge Art et Travail (Art and Work). The famous British politician Winston Churchill also confirmed that Lenin and Trotsky belonged to the circle of the Masonic and Illuminist conspirators (Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8th, 1920).

Lenin, Zinoviev, Radek and Sverdlov also belonged to B'nai B'rith. Researchers who are specialised on the activities of B'nai B'rith, including Schwartz-Bostunich, confirmed this information. (Viktor Ostretsov, 'Freemasonry, Culture and Russian History', Moscow, 1999, pp, 582-583.) Lenin was a freemason of the 31st degree (Grand Inspecteur Inquisiteur Commandeur) and a member of the lodge Art et Travail in Switzerland and France. (Oleg Platonov, 'Russia's Crown of Thorns: The Secret History of Freemasonry', Moscow, 2000, part II, p. 417.) When Lenin visited the headquarters of Grand Orient on Rue Cadet in Paris, he signed the visitors' book. (Viktor Kuznetsov, 'The Secret of the October Coup', St.

Petersburg, 2001, p. 42.) Together with Trotsky, Lenin took part in the International Masonic Conference in Copenhagen in 1910.

(Franz Weissin, 'Der Weg zum Sozialismus' / 'The Way to Socialism', Munich, 1930, p. 9.) The socialisation of Europe was on the agenda. Alexander Galpern, then secretary of the Masonic Supreme Council, confirmed in 1916 that there were Bolsheviks among the freemasons. I can further mention Nikolai Sukhanov (actually Himmer) and N. According to Galpern's testimony, the freemasons also gave Lenin financial aid for his revolutionary activity.

This was certified by a known freemason, Grigori Aronson, in his article 'Freemasons in Russian Politics', published in the Novoye Russkoye Slovo (New York, 8th-12th of October, 1959). The historian Boris Nikolayevsky also mentioned this in his book 'The Russian Freemasons and the Revolution' (Moscow, 1990). In 1914, two Bolsheviks, Ivan Skvortsov-Stepanov and Grigori Petrovsky, contacted the freemason Alexander Konovalov for economic aid. The latter became a minister in the Provisional Government. Radio Russia also spoke of Lenin's activities as a freemason on the 12th of August 1991.

The First Freemasons in Russia The first Masonic lodges in Russia were founded in the 1730s. Catherine II banned all Masonic organizations in Russia April 8, 1782 since they had secret political ties with leading circles abroad. Freemasonry was legalised again in 1801 after Alexander I ascended the throne.

He became a freemason himself, despite the fact that his father had been murdered by freemasons. The leading Decembrists (Pavel Pestel, Sergei Trubetskoi and Sergei Volkonsky) belonged to the Masonic lodges, The Reunited Friends (Les Amis Reunis), The Three Virtues, and The Sphinx. The main secret societies of the Decembrists were The United Slavs and The Three Virtues. Freemasonry was banned again in 1822, when the government discovered that the Masonic lodges were actually secret societies planning to transform the state system and infiltrate the government.

Tsar Alexander I had discovered that the freemasons were controlled by an invisible hand. Naturally he forbade their activities in Russia. This decision was to cost him his life. Nicholas I, who ruled from 1825 to 1855, became especially strict regarding freemasonry. All the lodges were forced to operate underground. The chief enemies of the Russian freemasons were national monarchism and Christianity. This is why they worked with 'enlightenment propaganda'.

The Russian freemasons also tended towards cosmopolitanism. Their watchword demanded: 'Be prepared!' , and the freemason had to answer: 'Always prepared!' Motifs from Judaism and Cabbalism dominated the ideology and political symbolism of freemasonry. To an outsider it might all have seemed confusing and unreal.

On the 31st of October 1893, Vladimir Ulyanov arrived in the capital, St. Petersburg, where he began his subversive activity. He called himself a professional revolutionary. In the autumn of 1895, after a period abroad, Vladimir Ulyanov, together with other conspirators in St.

Petersburg, founded the Fighting League for the Liberation of the Working Classes, which developed into a terrorist group. It was actually Israel Helphand (or Geldphand) alias Alexander Parvus, a Jewish multi-millionaire from Odessa, who backed this project. He was a businessman and freemason. According to the British historian Nesta Webster, Parvus became a member of the German Social Democratic Party in 1886. In December 1895, Vladimir Ulyanov was imprisoned for illegal activities.

He spent the years 1898-1900 in exile in Shushenskoye by the Yenisei in Siberia. He received generous benefits from the state.

He lived in a spacious house and ate well. In March 1898, the leading Jewish social democrats gathered in Minsk - those representing the international line (the struggle for power in the host nation) as well as those representing the nationalist attitude of the Jewish workers' union Bund, which was founded in Vilno (Vilnius) in 1897, and propagated the founding of a Zionist state. They decided to unite the subversive Marxist groups and to illegally form the Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party.

Only nine delegates were present at its Constitutional Congress and those elected a central committee consisting of Aron Kremer, Boris Eidelman and Radshenko. Other known social democrats were Pavel (Pinchus) Axelrod (Boruch), Leon Deutsch, Vera Zasulich, Natan Vigdorchik, V. Kosovsky (Levinson), and the only Russian was Georgi Plekhanov, whose wife Roza was a Jewess. In February 1900, Vladimir Ulyanov travelled to Switzerland. Later, he lived in Munich, Brussels, London, Paris, Krakow, Geneva, Stockholm and Zurich. To intensify the Marxist propaganda, the red-bearded Lenin, together with Parvus, founded the subversive newspaper Iskra (The Spark), in Munich in 1900, the first issue of which came out on the 24th of December 1900. The newspaper was smuggled into Russia.

For tactical reasons, Lenin made the famous Russian social democrat Georgi Plekhanov the first editor of the newspaper. Plekhanov had no wish to remain Lenin's puppet, however, and so the Jew L. Martov (Yuli Zederbaum) soon replaced him. At the Second Party Congress in Brussels in 1903, Plekhanov supported Martov's suggestion to camouflage the introduction of Socialism with democracy. Lenin demanded the introduction of a hard socialist dictatorship.

In Sweden, the freemasons have successfully used Martov's ideas to build a socialist 'people's home' and to introduce tax slavery. At this congress, the Jew Martov suggested that the Party should be subordinate to the Jews - the chosen people. In contrast, the half-Jew Lenin, wanted the Jews to be subordinate to the Party. A majority supported Lenin's suggestion and these were therefore called the Bolsheviks (the majority).

The minority (Mensheviks) supported Martov's suggestion and acted in the classic manner of social democrats, using demagogy and cunning. The Party was split. The true reasons have until now been left out of the official Party history. Leon Trotsky was then among the Mensheviks.

He regarded Lenin as a despot and a terrorist (Louis Fischer, 'The Life of Lenin', London, 1970, p. Iskra came under the influence of the Mensheviks. Lenin, who disliked disputes, left the editorial staff and started his own periodical, Vperyod. A famous Jewish textiles magnate and capitalist from Moscow, Savva Morozov, financed this. (Louis Fischer, 'The Life of Lenin', London, 1970, p.

68.) The Morozov brothers had given the proletarian writer Maxim Gorky a two-storeyed house and provided the Bolsheviks with large amounts of money. Lenin's Nature Lenin tried to work out his own ism, a doctrine, which differed very little from the basic teachings of the Illuminati. Leninism became such a terrible and efficient brake on all areas of social development that the use of that ideology must be regarded as a crime against humanity. Russia is now attempting to salvage itself through the process of dismantling Leninism. This is the only way, since Vladimir Ulyanov, known under the pseudonym of Lenin, was the root of all the evils of Communism in Russia.

His true nature has only recently been revealed. It is doubtful whether any other leader has lied to such an amazing extent about himself and everything else. An incredible amount of myths has been created about him to hide his evil nature and destructive acts. He introduced logocracy (power through the use of barefaced lies), which became a political weapon. Comrade Ulyanov knew that the lie could be changed into truth if only it was made credible and attractive and then repeated often enough.

He understood that the people would once again become strong and independent if they were kept well informed about the state of affairs, were to decide on their own existence and to work with sensible things. ('Works', Vol.

228.) This is why he introduced a severe censorship and counted on half-lies to be an even more effective weapon against a sensible development. Only in 1991-1992, were researchers given access to 3724 secret documents. These papers showed clearly what a beast Lenin really was. It was also revealed that Lenin had been an unsuccessful lawyer, who had only had six cases in which he defended shoplifters. He lost all six cases.

A week later, he had had enough and gave up the profession. He never had a real job after that. According to both older documents and others, which have been made available more recently, it is clear that Lenin was the worst, most demagogic, bloodthirsty, merciless and inhuman dictator in the history of the world. The American socialist John Reed, who met Lenin, described him as a strange person: colourless and without humour.

Despite this, he propagandised for Communism in the United States since he was well paid to do so. Once, in 1920, he was paid the giant sum of 1 080,000 roubles for his services. (Dagens Nyheter, May 30, 1995.).

'Dictatorship is a state of intensive warfare.' In this war he was merciful to the 'useful idiots' (Lenin's term) only at the beginning. Dzerzhinsky (Rufin), chief of the Cheka (political police) was truthful when he said: 'We need no justice.' Lenin, Trotsky and Zinoviev had declared a holy war in the name of Communism on the 1st of September 1920. Zinoviev had called Dzerzhinsky 'the saint of the revolution'.

Stalin regarded him as 'the eternal flame'. In reality, he was a sadist and a drug-addict.

Lenin declared. 'Peace means, quite simply, the dominion of Communism over the entire world.' (Lenin, 'Theses about the Tasks of the Communist Youth'.) Lenin's opponents in this war were all who had differing ideas about life and spiritual matters, for such people were physically repugnant to him.

He was constantly giving orders for people to be hanged, shot, burned. Thus he demanded the priests in Shuya to be executed to a man. He ordered the city of Baku to be burned down, if its resistance could not be crushed in some other way.

At the same time, Lenin was extremely capricious. Lenin ruled by the aid of decrees. There were no longer any laws in force. When the first Soviet penal laws were worked out in 1922, Lenin demanded in his directions that the penal laws should 'justify and legalise terror in principle, clearly, without embellishment'.

Hitherto, revelations of this sort have mostly concerned Joseph Stalin, Lenin's faithful pupil. It is now high time to destroy the last remaining myths about Lenin.

Lenin became a synonymous for injustice and falsehood. He promised to give the peasants land, but finally confiscated everything. In 1918 he replaced the slogan about the nationalisation of the land with demands about the socialisation of the land. (Yuri Chernichenko's article 'Who Needs the Farmers' Party and Why?' , Literaturnaya Rossiya, 8th March 1991.) Marx had written that the land must be confiscated at once. Lenin put off doing that.

Later, he offered 100,000 roubles for every landowning farmer hanged. Lenin promised to make the worker his own master, but made him a slave instead. He promised to abolish the bureaucratic apparatus, but even in his lifetime it grew into a vast army of parasites. There were 231,000 bureaucrats in Russia in August 1918. In 1922 there were already 243,000, despite Lenin's orders for a lessening of the numbers.

In 1988 there were 18 million bureaucrats in the Soviet Empire, 11 per cent of the working population of 165 million. Lenin claimed that the Party should keep no secrets from the people. But the whole apparatus of the Communist Party was surrounded with secrecy. Lenin promised peace, instead there was civil war.

He promised bread but brought about a catastrophic famine. He promised to make the people happy and brought terrible calamities down upon them. It was Lenin who banned the oppositional newspapers. Two days after seizing power, he issued a decree abolishing the freedom of the press. During the first week he shut down ten newspapers and ten more in the following week, until all newspapers he disliked had ceased to exist. Lenin also disbanded all other political parties (except Bund and Po'alei Zion).

On the 17th of November 1917, several commissars protested against Lenin's decision to form a government consisting of only one party - the Bolsheviks, since there were other parties represented in the workers' councils. He showed no mercy to his good friend L.

Martov, the Jewish leader of the Mensheviks (one of the few whom Lenin used the familiar term of address with). In 1920, he exiled Martov from Soviet Russia, thereby at least sparing his life. It was Lenin who started the first mock-trials. Thus he put twelve social revolutionaries on trial in 1922. Lenin himself had come up with all the trickery necessary to bring about this case. Stalin used similar methods during the years 1936-37. It was Lenin who ordered the arrests of foreign socialists and communists in Russia.

The Chekists were given free rein. It was Lenin who came up with the slogan: 'Take back what was robbed!' According to this exhortation, the Bolsheviks were to plunder all of Russia's riches. On the 22nd of November 1917 he issued a decree in which he demanded that all gold, jewels, furs and other valuables were to be confiscated during house searches (Lenin, 'Collected Works', Moscow, Vol.

The thorough falsification of Lenin's biography concerned even the smallest, least significant details. However, the big lie begins with the small ones.

On the 21st of January 1954, Pravda wrote about Lenin's living conditions on Rue Bonieux in Paris: 'Vladimir Ilyich lived in a small flat where a tiny room served as his study and where the kitchen was used as both dining and reception room.' But Lenin himself wrote on the 19th of December 1908 in a letter to his sister: 'We found a very pleasant flat. Four rooms, a kitchen and pantry, water, gas.' His wife Nadezhda Krupskaya confirmed in her 'Memoirs': 'The flat on Rue Bonieux was large and bright and there were even mirrors above the heating stoves. We even had a room for my mother, Maria, there.'

Lenin paid 1000 francs a month for the flat. Lenin also rented an expensive, four-roomed flat at Kaptensgatan 17 in Ostermalm (east-central Stockholm) in the autumn of 1910. This is where he met his mother for the last time. The many stories about 'kind-hearted Lenin' played a major part in the Soviet mythology.

The proletarian author Maxim Gorky warned about Lenin with the following words: 'Anyone who does not wish to spend all his time arguing should steer clear of Lenin.' It must be stressed that Lenin had very few friends.

He used the familiar term of address only with his relations and two others, L. Martov and G. He also spoke familiarly with his two lovers, Inessa Armand and Yelena Stasova. His Party comrades disliked him.

They did not even tell him about the February coup in 1917. He learned about this when reading Neue Ziircher Zeitung. Even then he had difficulty believing it was true. The Sovietologist Mikhail Voslensky emphasised in his book 'Mortal Gods' ('Sterbliche Gotter', Dietmar Straube Publishing, Erlangen/Bonn/Vienna, 1989) that Lenin was one of those few dictators who left plenty of written evidence of his crimes against humanity behind him. Among other things, Lenin demanded: 'The more representatives of the reactionary priesthood we manage to shoot, the better.'

Before the Bolsheviks seized power there were 360,000 priests in Russia. At the end of 1919 only 40,000 remained alive. (Vladimir) Soloukhin, 'In the Light of Day', Moscow, 1992, p. 59.) Voslensky claims that Lenin was personally responsible for the murders of 13 million people. He believed that Lenin clearly expressed the true value of Marxism.

He said: 'What can one extract from poisonous plants except poison?' Voslensky was of the opinion that Lenin had taken over Marx's credo, whereby he was in the right even when he was wrong. Finally, Voslensky stated that the communist ideology must be criminal, since it has brought forth so many terrible tyrants and demagogues. According to Mikhail Voslensky, Lenin was one of the worst and most vulgar of them.

Cruelty and brutality were coupled with cowardice in Lenin's nature. This was claimed by a former Party worker, Oleg Agranyants, in his book. 'What is to be Done?

Or Deleninisation of our Society' (London, 1989). He gave the following example of Lenin's cowardice: T. Alexinskaya wrote in the periodical Rodnaya Zemlya No.

'When I first saw Lenin at a meeting near St. Petersburg in 1906, I was truly disappointed. It was not so much his superficiality, but rather the fact that when someone cried 'Cossacks!'

, Lenin was the first to run away. I looked after him. He jumped over the barricade. His hat fell off.' Similar notes about Lenin can be found among the papers of the Okhrana (the secret police), where it is mentioned that the fleeing Lenin fell into a canal, from which he had to be pulled out.

Nobody present at this subversive meeting was detained. Despite Lenin's secret and criminal incomes, he constantly demanded money from his mother until her death in 1916. Stalin brought money to Lenin's Bolsheviks through bank and train robberies. Maxim Litvinov also committed bank robberies, giving the money to the Bolsheviks.

Oleg Agranyants also referred to a report in the files of the Okhrana concerning Lenin's visits to the German embassy in Switzerland. It was later revealed that Lenin was a German agent. Lenin was well aware of the seductive power of money. That was why he generously dealt out cheques for large amounts to farmers and non-Russian nationalists in the autumn of 1919. Some of them were taken in by this swindle and perhaps believed the Bolsheviks to be a party of Santa Clauses. Nobody could guess that those cheques lacked cover (Paul Johnson, 'Modern Times', Stockholm, 1987, p. One year earlier (autumn of 1918), Lenin had sent gangs of armed workers to several places in the countryside with orders to bring back as much food produce as possible.

(Paul Johnson, 'Modern Times', Stockholm, 1987, p. 128.) Lenin's Terror Lenin's Jewish wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya wrote about Lenin's blood-lust, cruelty and greed in her 'Memoirs', published in Moscow in 1932.

Krupskaya described how Lenin once rowed a boat out to a little island in the Yenisei River where many rabbits had migrated during the winter. Lenin clubbed so many rabbits to death with the butt of his rifle that the boat sank under the weight of all the dead bodies - an almost symbolic act. Lenin enjoyed hunting and killing. Later, after he had seized power, he showed a similarly savage attitude to those who did not agree with his plans of enslavement. And how many really supported his barbarous methods? In 1975, a collection of documents was published in Moscow, 'Lenin and the Cheka', which explains that Lenin had adopted the terror methods of Maximilien 'de' Robespierre.

The latter had been merciless, especially to the spiritual aristocracy. As early as the 24th of January 1918, Lenin said that the communist terror should have been much more merciless ('There is a long way to go to the real terror'). On April 28, 1918, Pravda and Izvestiya published Lenin's article 'The Present Tasks of the Soviet Power' where he wrote, among other things: 'Our regime is too soft.' He thought the Russians unsuited to implement his terror - they were too well intentioned. That was why he preferred the Jews. Naturally, not all the Jews joined, only the worst, most hateful and most fanatical ones.

This fact that Lenin believed the Jews to be much more efficient in the 'revolutionary struggle' was kept a state secret by order of Joseph Stalin, despite the fact that Maria Ulyanova had wanted to make it public a few years after Vladimir Lenin's death. Lenin's sister believed that this fact would have been useful in the struggle against anti-Semitism (Dagens Nyheter, 15th February 1995).

The vice-chairman of the Cheka, Martyn Lacis (actually Janis Sudrabs, a Latvian Jew) wrote the following in his book 'The Cheka's Struggle against the Counter-Revolution' (Moscow, 1921, p. 'These Jewish elements were mobilised against the saboteurs. In this way, they succeeded in saving the revolution at this critical stage.' (Todor Dichev, 'The Terrible Conspiracy', Moscow, 1994, pp.

40-41.) I personally know several anti-Communist Jews who have distanced themselves from the fanatical Jews' terrible atrocities in the Soviet Union, since those crimes have discredited all other Jews. On the 26th of June 1918, Lenin gave orders to 'expand the revolutionary terror'. In Lenin's opinion, it was impossible to bring about a revolution without executions. He especially wanted to shoot all those responsible for counter-propaganda.

According to Leon Trotsky's testimony, Lenin had shouted: 'Is this dictatorship? This is just semolina pudding!' About ten times a day throughout July 1918. In the same year he gave orders to execute 200 people in Petrograd for the sole reason that they had attended church, been working with handicraft or had sold something. Here are some examples of Lenin's 'mild' telegrams in 1918. 'The executions should be increased!'

('Collected Works', 5th edition, Vol. 189.) The war historian Dmitri Volgokonov found in the KGB archives a dreadful decree, which he published in his book. In this decree, Lenin demanded that all peasants resisting the Bolsheviks should be hanged. The tyrant specified: 'At least a hundred of them, so that all may see!' The peasants in the province of Penza began to resist at the beginning of August 1918. Lenin at once sent a telegram to the local executive committee with instructions to start practising merciless terror against the kulaks (well-to-do farmers), the priests and the White Guards. He recommended that all 'suspect people' should be sent to concentration camps.

Three days later, he sent a new message in which he expressed surprise at not having received any messages in answer to his demands. He hoped that no one was showing any weakness in dealing with the revolt and wrote that the possessions of the farmers (especially corn) should be confiscated. Winston Churchill called the Bolsheviks 'angry baboons' on the 26th of November 1918. Lists of those shot and otherwise executed were published in the Cheka's weekly newspaper.

In this way it can be proved that 1.7 million people were executed during the period 1918-19. A river of blood flowed through Russia. The Cheka had to employ body counters. According to official Soviet reports from May 1922, 1 695 904 people were executed from January 1921 to April 1922. Among these victims were bishops, professors, doctors, officers, policemen, gendarmes, lawyers, civil servants, journalists, writers, artists, nurses, workers and farmers. Their crime was 'anti-social thinking'. Here it must be pointed out that the Cheka was under the control of Jews, according to documents now available.

Much of this was known already in 1925. The researcher Larseh wrote in his book 'The Blood-Lust of Bolshevism' (Wurttemberg, p. 45) that 50 per cent of the Cheka consisted of Jews with Jewish names, 25 per cent were Jews who had taken Russian names.

All the chiefs were Jews. Lenin was well informed about all those serious crimes. All of the documents were placed on his desk. Lenin answered: 'Put more force into the terror.

Shoot every tenth person, place all the suspects in concentration camps!' The idea of 'concentration camps' was not Hitler's invention, as many now believe. Actually, the first concentration camps were built in 1838 in the United States for Indians. This method of isolating people appealed also to other cruel rulers. In 1898 concentration camps were built in Cuba, where the Spaniards imprisoned all oppositional elements.

In 1901, the English used the same form of collective imprisonment during the Boer war, where the name 'concentration camps' was also used. 26,000 Boer women and children starved to death in the British camps; 20,000 of them were under 16 years old. Lenin incarcerated people without any sentence, despite the establishment of revolutionary tribunals, as was the case in France under the Jacobins. Lenin actually claimed that the concentration camps were schools of labour. (Mikhail Heller and Alexander Nekrich, doctors of history, 'Utopia in Power', London, 1986, p. 67.) Lenin also claimed that the factory was the workers' only school.

They did not need any other education. He emphasised that anyone who could only do simple arithmetic could run a factory.

Methods of barbaric murders Just like the terror of the Jacobins in France, the Jewish Bolshevik functionaries used barges to drown people in. Bela Kuhn (actually Aaron Kohn) and Roza Zemlyachka (actually Rozalia Zalkind) drowned Russian officers in this way in the Crimea in the autumn of 1920. (Igor Bunich, 'The Party's Gold', St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 73.) The unusually cruel Jewish Chekist Mikhail Kedrov (actually Zederbaum) drowned 1092 Russian officers in the White Sea in the spring of 1920. Lenin and his accomplices did not arrest just anyone.

They executed those most active in society, the independent thinkers. Lenin gave orders to kill as many students as possible in several towns. The Chekists arrested every youth wearing a school cap. They were liquidated because Lenin believed the coming Russian intellectuals would be a threat to the Soviet regime.

(Vladimir Soloukhin, 'In the Light of Day', Moscow 1992, p. 40.) The role of the Russian intellectuals in society was taken over by the Jews. Many students (for example in Yaroslavl) learned quickly and hid their school caps. Afterwards, the Chekists stopped all suspect youths and searched their hair for the stripe of the school cap. If the stripe was found, the youth was killed on the spot. The author Vladimir Soloukhin revealed that the Chekists were especially interested in handsome boys and pretty girls.

These were the first to be killed. It was believed that there would be more intellectuals among attractive people. Attractive youths were therefore killed as a danger to society. No crime as terrible as this has hitherto been described in the history of the world. The terror was co-ordinated by the Chekist functionary Joseph Unschlicht.

How did they go about the murders? The Jewish Chekists flavoured murder with various torture methods.

In his documentary 'The Russia We Lost', the director Stanislav Govorukhin told how the priesthood in Kherson were crucified. The archbishop Andronnikov in Perm was tortured: his eyes were poked out, his ears and nose were cut off. In Kharkov the priest Dmitri was undressed.

When he tried to make the sign of the cross, a Chekist cut off his right hand. [Note: The murders committed by these ZioNazi satanists were carried out in precise correspondence with principles of ritual murder and were in fact the occultist sacrificial ceremonies, which were to be carried out inducing the maximum amount of pain and suffering in the victims.

During the inconceivable suffering the victim generates immense amounts of energy, which is consumed by the powers of evil, who exist on more subtle levels of existence - the puppet masters of these satanists.] Several sources tell how the Chekists in Kharkov placed the victims in a row and nailed their hands to a table, cut around their wrists with a knife, poured boiling water over the hands and pulled the skin off. This was called 'pulling off the glove'. In other places, the victim's head was placed on an anvil and slowly crushed with a steam hammer.

Those due to undergo the same punishment the next day were forced to watch. The eyes of church dignitaries were poked out, their tongues were cut off and they were buried alive. There were Chekists who used to cut open the stomachs of their victims, following which they pulled out a length of the small intestine and nailed it to a telegraph pole and, with a whip, forced the unlucky victim to run circles around the pole until the whole intestine had been unravelled and the victim died. The bishop of Voronezh was boiled alive in a big pot, after which the monks, with revolvers aimed at their heads, were forced to drink this soup. Other Chekists crushed the heads of their victims with special head-screws, or drilled them through with dental tools.

The upper part of the skull was sawn off and the nearest in line was forced to eat the brain, following which the procedure would be repeated to the end of the line. The Chekists often arrested whole families and tortured the children before the eyes of their parents, and the wives before their husbands. Mikhail Voslensky, a former Soviet functionary, described some of the cruel methods used by the Chekists in his book 'Nomenklatura' / 'Nomenclature' (Stockholm, 1982, p. 'In Kharkov, people were scalped. In Voronezh, the torture victims were placed in barrels into which nails were hammered so that they stuck out on the inside, upon which the barrels were set rolling.

A pentacle (usually a five-pointed star formerly used in magic) was burned into the foreheads of the victims. In Tsaritsyn and Kamyshin, the hands of victims were amputated with a saw.

In Poltava and Kremenchug, the victims were impaled. In Odessa, they were roasted alive in ovens or ripped to pieces. In Kiev, the victims were placed in coffins with a decomposing body and buried alive, only to be dug up again after half an hour.' Lenin was dissatisfied with these reports and demanded: 'Put more force into the terror!' All of this happened in the provinces. The reader can try to imagine how people were executed in Moscow.

The Russian-Jewish newspaper Yevreyskaya Tribuna stated on the 24th of August 1922 that Lenin had asked the rabbis if they were satisfied with the particularly cruel executions. [If ritual sacrifice is not performed with infliction of maximum amount of pain and suffering, it was considered to be insufficient, and, therefore, ineffective.] The Ideological Background of the Terror Compare the crimes mentioned in the previous chapter with the Old Testament account of King David's massacre of the entire civilian population of an enemy ('thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon'). He 'cut them with saws and with harrows of iron' and 'made them pass through the brick-kiln'. After the Second World War, this text was changed in most European Bibles. Now, many Bibles state that the people were put to work with the tools mentioned and were occupied with brick-making - something the inhabitants had been doing continually for several thousand years already. (This is found in II Samuel, 12:31, and in I Chronicles 20:3.) The Jewish extremists' serious crimes in Russia were committed in the true spirit of the Old Testament (King James' Bible).

• The god of the Israelites demands the mass-murder of Gentiles (i.e. Goyim = non-Jews), including women and children. (Deuteronomy, 20:16.) • Yahweh wishes to spread terror among the Gentiles (Deuteronomy, 2:25). • Yahweh demands the destruction of other religions (Deuteronomy, 7:5).

• The Jews may divide the prey of a great spoil (Isaiah, 33:23). • The Jews may make Gentiles their slaves (Isaiah, 14:2). • Those refusing to serve the Jews shall perish and be utterly wasted (Isaiah, 60:12). • Gentiles shall be forced to eat their own flesh (Isaiah, 49:26). Returning to the Bolshevik terror: in order to control the people's hatred of their Jewish torturers and executioners, people suspected of having an anti-Semitic attitude were also executed. Those in possession of the book 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion' were executed on the spot. At the end of March 1919, Lenin was forced to explain: 'The Jews are not the enemies of the working classes.

They are our friends in the struggle for Socialism.' But the people hated precisely this Socialism and those who practised terror in its name.

Vladimir Ulyanov's passion was to kill as many people as possible without thinking of the consequences. Of course, he never wondered whether it was really possible to build a state on violence and evil. Lenin showed the same kind of thoughtlessness by the Yenisei, where he had loaded his boat with so many dead rabbits with crushed heads that it sank under the weight. In August 1991 the state-ship Lenin had launched, sank. What else was to be expected?

In the beginning of the 1920s there were already 70,000 prisoners in 300 concentration camps, according to 'The Russian Revolution' by Richard Pipes at Harvard University, though in reality there were probably many more. It was in this manner that Lenin built his GULAG archipelago. Lenin often demonstrated short-sightedness or complete stupidity. For example, he hated railways. According to him, the railways were suitable for cultured civilisation only in the eyes of bourgeois professors. In Lenin's opinion, railways were a weapon with which to suppress millions of people. ('Collected Works', 2nd edition, Vol.

74.) The workers on the Baikal-Amur railway were not given this quote to read in their barracks. In 1916, Lenin claimed that capitalism would very soon die out. His Communism fell first.

Lenin was not in the least interested in the world's cultural heritage. He never visited the Louvre whilst in Paris. In 1910 he actually called Paris a despicable hole. The Jewish revolutionary Maria Essen, in her book 'Memories of Lenin' (part 1, p. 244) confirms that Lenin never visited museums or exhibitions. Gorky, however, forced him to visit the National Museum of Naples.

He avoided the workers' quarters of towns. (Paul Johnson, 'Modern Times', Stockholm, 1987, p. 82.) Indeed, Marx had said that the workers were stupid cattle. Lenin did not like listening to music. Why waste time on such rubbish? In his opinion, music awakened unnecessarily beautiful thoughts.

This was why he did not want anyone else to listen to music either, least of all to opera. Stalin's interpreter, Valentin Berezhkov, reveals in his memoranda that Lenin wanted to shut down the Bolshoi Theatre in Moscow, since the working classes had no need of operas. Only when it was explained to Lenin that opera music was a part of the Russian culture did he grudgingly give in. He had visited the Theatre of Arts only a few times, claims Anatoli Lunacharsky who also confirmed that Lenin was entirely ignorant of art. Lenin stressed that art must be utilised for the purposes of propaganda.

The purpose of art and culture was, according to Lenin, to serve Socialism, nothing else. This was why many Jewish abstractionists and other art jokers were immediately employed, among others Vasili Kandinsky, Kazimir Malevich and Isaac Brodsky, to make all public places shine with communist symbols, slogans and placards. Proletkult (the culture of the proletariat = culturelessness) was founded on Lenin's orders. Later, repressive methods were used to establish socialist realism - a rape of the arts in public. In this way the aristocratic, noble arts were destroyed.

At the head of the decadent placard painters was the Jew and freemason Marc Chagall, who for a time acted as Art Commissar in Vitebsk. Election campaigns were an unscientific method, thought Lenin. At the same time he gravely misjudged the political situation. Lenin said that 'the world war cannot come' in Krakow in 1912. ('Collected Works', 4th edition, Vol. 278.) However hard the 'great leader' of the proletariat tried, he could never learn to use a typewriter.

(Oleg Agranyants, 'What Should Be Done?' , London, 1989.) He hated all intellectuals; perhaps this was the result of an inferiority complex. Anatoli Lunacharsky (actually Bailikh Mandelstam), People's Commissary for Educational Affairs 1917-29 and a member of the Grand Orient, remembered how Gorky had complained to Lenin in 1918 about the imprisonment of the same intellectuals who had earlier helped Lenin and his companions in Petrograd. Lenin answered with a cynical smile. 'Their houses must be searched and they themselves imprisoned precisely because they are good people.

They always show compassion for the oppressed. They are always against persecution. This is why they can now be suspected of housing cadets and Octobrists.' (The collection 'Lenin and the Cheka', Moscow, 1975.) According to Lenin, there were no innocents among the intellectuals. All were the main enemies of Communism.

They were either against or neutral. They always sympathised with those who were persecuted at the time. In answering a letter to M.

Andreyeva on the 19th of September 1919, Lenin was honest to admit: 'Not jailing the intellectuals would be a crime.' He thought that they were in a position to aid the opposition and were therefore potentially dangerous.

Lenin's primary goal was to exterminate the most intelligent part of the Russian population. When the giants are gone, the dwarfs may revel. The Chekists usually invented the charges against the intellectuals. Sometimes Lenin released a scientist he had special need of.

Maxim Gorky used to make enquiries. Lenin skilfully utilised Gorky as a famous and popular author, since he needed him for reasons of propaganda. That was why he sometimes released certain intellectuals whom Gorky wanted freed from the Cheka's claws. Later, Lenin began to systematically utilise the knowledge of imprisoned scientists for his own purposes. Lenin began the persecution of intellectuals immediately after his rise to power. He made them starve to death or forced them to emigrate, or jailed or murdered them. Thus he gave orders to murder hundreds of thousands of intellectuals.

In a letter to Maxim Gorky on September 15th, 1919, he called the learned 'shits'. He also called the Russian intellectuals spies who intended to lead the young students to destruction.

On the 21st of February 1922 he demanded the dismissal of 20-40 professors at the Moscow Technical College, since they 'are making us stupid'. On the 10th of May 1922, he issued a decree demanding that the Russian intellectuals should be systematically expelled from the country by way of pest control.

He wanted this letter kept secret. On the 16th-18th of September 1922, '160 of the most active bourgeois ideologues' were expelled by government decree. Among these were Leon Karsavin, Principal of the University of Petrograd, and Novikov, Principal of the University of Moscow. He also expelled Staranov, head of the mathematics department at Moscow University, world famous biologists, zoologists, philosophers, historians, economists, mathematicians, several authors and publicists. Philosophers like Nikolai Berdyayev, Sergei Bulgakov and Ivan Ilyin, as well as Vladimir Zvorykin and the author Ivan Bunin, who received the Nobel Prize for literature in 1933, can also be mentioned. There were no important names among these, if the GPU (political police) were to be believed. The Bolsheviks kept quiet the fact that nearly all of those expelled belonged to various secret societies, among others the Light Blue Star.

Trotsky demanded as early as 1918 that the Cheka leave this organization alone. In this way Lenin drained the country of its finest minds. Eventually, Lenin managed to purge Russia almost entirely of educated, wise and free-thinking people. The worst began to rule the best of those who were still left.

What had been regarded as wrong for centuries now became a virtue. In this way, Lenin introduced the right to dishonesty. Lenin became completely intoxicated with the possibility of murdering and plundering with impunity. Instead of the word 'plunder', he preferred 'confiscate', 'seize', 'take and not return', just like a real bandit!

He wrote: 'I do not want to believe that you would show any weakness in confiscating wealth.' (Lenin, 'Collected Works', second edition, Vol. 491.) He lacked mercy also for the common people; he did not give a thought to their fate. At the same time, he constantly controlled the efficiency of Chekists. On the 2nd of April 1921, he demanded a decrease in the number of mouths to feed in the factories. He meant that those in excess should be executed.

A true terrorist, Lenin demanded that the Bolsheviks should take hostages, who were to be mercilessly executed if he did not have his way. He commanded hostages to be taken in all plundering expeditions. Those hostages were to be killed if wealth and possessions were not handed over to the Red Guards, or if an attempt to conceal any part of their wealth was made. Eventually, all Soviet citizens became hostages anyway, locked into a ghetto walled in by the iron curtain.

Those who might pose a threat to the Bolsheviks' dominion were isolated within the ghetto in the concentration camps. The following can be read in 'The Decision on the Red Terror', September 5, 1918.

'I spit on Russia, for I am a Bolshevik.' (Igor Bunich, 'The Party's Gold', St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 17.) This expression also became a slogan for the other leading Bolsheviks and Russia was turned into a bandit state.

'Socialism is the ideology of envy,' declared the philosopher Nikolai Berdyayev in 1918. If he had said this openly, he would have been shot on the spot. This was true, since Lenin, after exploiting the envy of the workers and poor peasants, began to mercilessly eliminate those who resisted him, just like when he clubbed the rabbits. He gave orders to open fire on the workers if necessary, which actually happened when peaceful demonstrators in Astrakhan were fired upon in March 1919. Two thousand workers were killed.

(Igor Bunich, 'The Party's Gold', St. Petersburg, 1992, pp. 58-59.) One hundred railway builders in Yekaterinoslavl were shot for trying to organise a strike. The shooting of workers in this way continued up to the middle of April 1919. In the first three months of 1919 alone, 138,000 workers were shot. The Bolsheviks finally managed to destroy nearly all of the best workers. Labour activists were also fired upon in the reign of Nikita Khrushchev.

Soviet soldiers shot 80 demonstrators in Novocherkassk by the Black Sea in June 1962. It was Lenin who introduced the method of shooting people on the spot. He stamped Russian businessmen as enemies of the people and then gave orders for them to be shot as speculators. The Chekists used certain tricks to lure their victims to their place of execution. 2000 tsarist officers were called to a theatre in Kiev for control of identity papers.

All were shot without mercy. Another 2000 were shot on the spot in Stavropol. Lenin encouraged the soldiers to kill their officers, the workers to kill their engineers and directors, the peasants to kill their landowners.

Towards the end of 1922 there were virtually no intelligent people left in Russia, and the few left did not have any possibility of publishing on otherwise giving vent to their ideas. The great author Mikhail Bulgakov was allowed to speak openly after the death of Lenin but the agitatory clown Vladimir Mayakovsky (of Jewish extraction) immediately threatened. 'All has been forbidden. I am crushed, persecuted and totally alone,' he wrote in a letter to Gorky. 13 of Bulgakov's 15 critics were Jews.

(Dagens Nyheter, August 10, 1988.) Many poets perished under Lenin. Among those executed was the 35-year-old poet Nikolai Gumilev, killed on the 21st of August 1921. It was Grigori Zinoviev who gave the order to execute Nikolai Gumilev. At the beginning of the New Economic Policy, Lenin was dissatisfied that the terror had to be reined in, but he promised to continue even more intensively in the future.

'Unfortunately, the peasants destroyed only a fifteenth of the estates; only a fifteenth of what they should have destroyed.' (Lenin, 'Collected Works', second edition, Vol. 279.) In France, the Jacobin 'revolutionaries' had ordered the peasants to destroy castles and manors. Lenin also ordered churches plundered and destroyed. In this manner he collected 48 billion roubles in gold.

('In the Light of Day' by Vladimir Soloukhin, Moscow, 1992, p. 59.) The monastery at Solovetsk was turned into a concentration camp. In the same way, the museums were looted and the booty smuggled abroad. The largest Rembrandt collection in the world was kept at the Hermitage, but this was sold, like art treasures from Russian mansions. On the 7th of November, Lenin said in a speech to the Russian people: 'You must be prepared to sacrifice everything to conquer the world!' Lenin never wanted to reach the truth through discussion. He was only interested in enforcing the will of his criminal organization through deception, plunder and murder.

Since the Russian people refused to accept the Bolsheviks' insane system, they were forced to liquidate a third of the population, wrote the author Vladimir Soloukhin in the periodical Ogonyok in December of 1990. Vladimir Lenin took over many of the methods of the anarchist terrorist Sergei Nechayev (1847-82), who had plans to introduce barracks-Communism into Russia. Lenin called his own method 'war-Communism'. Nechayev had worked with the Illuminatus Mikhail Bakunin.

Due to the influence of Bakunin, Nechayev came to believe that everything was morally justifiable to a revolutionary. He even recommended joining robbers, who could also be said to belong to the true revolutionaries. This idea became the basis of Lenin's later tactics. Mao Zedong (China) also used these same tactics. Nechayev had taken part in the student troubles in 1868 and tried to set up a terrorist organization called The Axe or The People's Settlement in Moscow the following year.

He later founded the terrorist group Hell, in which the Marxist terrorist Nikolai Fedoseyev (1871-1898) eventually became an important figure. He poisoned his father in order to donate his inheritance to revolutionary activity. Fedoseyev founded the first Marxist clubs in Kazan. One of the members of these was Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin), who joined in 1888. (The collection 'Chernyshevsky and Nechayev', Moscow, 1983.) Sergei Nechayev wrote 'The Catechism of the Revolution' in 1868-69, in which he asserted. 'There is a need for conspirators with iron-hard discipline for the revolution to succeed. These must spy even on their comrades and report every suspicious act.'

In this way, Nechayev personally organised the murder of a critical member. After this, he fled abroad in 1872. The Swiss police extradited him to Russia in the same year, and he was sentenced to 20 years of hard labour. In his 'Catechism of the Revolution' Nechayev stressed that a revolutionary must be merciless against all of society, especially against the intellectuals. But he must also exploit the fanaticism of the individualist terrorists.

These were later to be forgotten or even destroyed according to need. As we know, Stalin began to liquidate social revolutionary terrorists - all in line with Lenin's instructions. A well-known children's song in praise of Lenin goes like this: 'The great Lenin was so noble, considerate, wise and good.' But the 'good' Lenin did not care about the living conditions of the people.

He hated children. Lenin was only interested in his own power and well-being. He also saw to it that his gang of bandits lived well, and also his relatives.

Lenin organised holidays for his relatives to various spas, had this paid for by the state and gave them state subsidies. There is written evidence of how Lenin gave Sergo Ordzhonikidze orders to take care of his lover Inessa Armand in the best possible manner when she arrived in Kislovodsk.

The first special telephone was given to the same 'comrade Inessa'. It was Lenin who introduced the privileges of the Nomenclatura, whilst he changed the life of normal people into a downright nightmare. It can be mentioned here that when Lenin spent 14 months in a jail in St.

Petersburg in 1895-96, he received meals directly from a restaurant. He also ordered a special mineral water from a pharmacy. As a dictator, Lenin's ugly attributes came to the fore.

He kept his personal fortune, which he had gained from plundered art, valuables and gems he had sold, in a Swiss bank. In 1920 alone, Lenin transferred 75 million Swiss francs into his account. (Igor Bunich, 'The Party's Gold', St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 83.) This was confirmed in The New York Times in the same year. The same newspaper wrote on the 23rd of August 1921 that comrade Leon Trotsky had two personal bank accounts in the United States in which he had a total of 80 million dollars.

Meanwhile, Lenin claimed that there was no money to help the hungry or to support culture with. According to the myth, Lenin thought only of others.

Lenin had earlier stolen money from the Party funds, despite the fact he received his wages from the same source. Once he emptied the whole fund to buy votes from members of the Central Committee.

One can read the following in 'The Memories of the Russian Socialist' by T. Alexinskaya (Paris, 1923). 'Ulyanov does not want to return the Party's money, which he has appropriated like a thief.' (Excerpt from the minutes.) In England, charges were raised against Lenin for an unpaid debt.

In 1907, he had borrowed money from the soap-boiler Feltz, which he had promised to repay, but had not. The police wanted Ulyanov.

The police in France also wanted him in 1907, following which he travelled to other countries, including Sweden. He owed 10,000 gold roubles to a band of robbers, who should have received arms for this money through Lenin. The leader of the gang, Stepan Lbov, was caught and hanged. With this, Lenin believed the problem was solved. But one of the bandits came to demand the money. Lenin fled, but was sought after by the police. He had also appropriated the inheritance of the millionaire Schmidt, amounting to 475,000 Swiss francs.

So doing, Lenin acted in accordance with the Jesuit-Illuminist principle - the ends justify the means. Independently thinking people will be aware that the immense crimes of the Soviet Communist Party can never be atoned for. It is equally impossible to justify the acts of 'individual comrades', Lenin among others. In fact Lenin was fascinated by violence. He spoke of the so-called French Revolution and above all praised the violence it had involved. Lenin was entranced by violence - he used to lick his lips when a chance to use violence presented itself.

Mark Yelizarov, the husband of Lenin's older sister Anna, said to comrade Georgi Solomon that Lenin was abnormal. (Georgi Solomon, 'Lenin and his Family', Paris, 1931.) Charles Rappoport asserted in 1914 that Lenin was a swindler of the worst sort. Vyacheslav Menzhinsky called Lenin a political Jesuit in the Russian exile newspaper Nashe Slovo (Paris, July 1916). Menzhinsky was named People's Commissary for Financial Affairs after the Bolshevik seizure of power. In 1918, he was Soviet Russia's consul-general in Berlin and later, in 1919, he held leading positions within the Cheka.

In 1926, he became head of the OGPU (political police), a position he held until 1934, when Stalin had him executed. In 1916, Menzhinsky had openly stated that the aim of the Leninists was to suppress the voice of the workers.